Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+wspr\s*$/: 118 ]

Total 118 documents matching your query.

1. Re: LF: wspr (score: 1)
Author: "mal hamilton" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2008 12:29:51 +0100
I did not ask a question about filtering !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! What I said was why use SSB mode which is 3 khz wide for a 6hz/200 hz wide signal when one could take advantage of the receiver narrow CW f
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2008-12/msg00050.html (13,589 bytes)

2. LF: wspr (score: 1)
Author: "mal hamilton" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2008 17:36:02 +0100
Has anyone tried WSJT 7.02 in WSPR mode and found it better than the wspr 1.01version. Your experience ? mal/g3kev
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2008-12/msg00249.html (9,570 bytes)

3. Re: LF: wspr (score: 1)
Author: Scott Tilley <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2008 21:00:33 -0800
If you could read you would do some research at K1JT's wonderful website: http://www.physics.princeton.edu/pulsar/K1JT/ Joe has laboured for many a year on similar projects and has written much about
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2008-12/msg00311.html (11,903 bytes)

4. LF: WSPR (score: 1)
Author: "mal hamilton" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2008 10:45:36 +0100
Having used practically every mode both as a radio amateur and commercial operator morse code (CW) is the most effective method for a radio amateur where only a minimum amount of information is excha
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2008-12/msg00342.html (11,514 bytes)

5. Re: LF: wspr (score: 1)
Author: "Mark" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2008 14:21:35 +0100
Mal The answer is simple in many cases. Why not? I will explain. You can use a narrower filter if you like, it would have to be 200Hz wide to allow the reception of all WSPR signals in the range of t
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2008-12/msg00424.html (20,167 bytes)

6. LF: wspr (score: 1)
Author: "mal hamilton" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2008 19:51:30 +0100
If recent published info is correct, this specifies a bandwidth of 6hz why is USB with a bandwidth of 3 khz necessary to receive this transmission. Surely it would be obvious that CW mode was more ap
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2008-12/msg00548.html (9,148 bytes)

7. Re: LF: wspr (score: 1)
Author: "mal hamilton" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2008 14:49:34 +0100
Hi Mark A sensible response to my own observations, others seem to miss the poiint and go off at a tangent if it differs from their own opinion. In this context about WSPR I am able to see the other
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2008-12/msg00649.html (16,467 bytes)

8. Re: LF: WSPR (score: 1)
Author: Alberto di Bene <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2009 00:06:15 +0100
Hi all, dj8wx is xmitting at 135,975kHz in WSPR mode, pwr abt 50mWERP. RX dial 134,475kHz (USB). No traces of your signal, but another one showed up, about 80 Hz lower... 2240 -21 1.8 0.135896 -1 TM0
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-01/msg00018.html (10,613 bytes)

9. Re: LF: WSPR (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 17:41:33 EST
Hello Uwe, could you increase your power for just one test, HBG 22 is too strong. F4DTL Nicolas. Dans un e-mail daté du 09/01/2009 20:55:13 Paris, Madrid, [email protected] a écrit : Hi all, dj
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-01/msg00019.html (9,963 bytes)

10. Re: LF: WSPR (score: 1)
Author: Piotr Mynarski <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 00:36:05 +0100
Gus wrote: Hi all,   any who know abt RS232 and WSPR!     can WSPR program accept "DTR" as interface power from RS 232 port ?     73 de Gus SM6BHZ hello Gus, LF yes it works either on DTR or RTS line
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-01/msg00093.html (10,064 bytes)

11. LF: wspr (score: 1)
Author: "mal hamilton" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 20:14:28 +0100
Some vy strong traces at present on 500 but only G4JNT is decoding. 184600 13 -13 -0.1-227 0 G4JNT 090 23 Andy does that help mal/g3kev
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-01/msg00123.html (9,092 bytes)

12. LF: WSPR (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 20:54:01 +0100
Hi all, dj8wx is xmitting at 135,975kHz in WSPR mode, pwr abt 50mWERP. RX dial 134,475kHz (USB). regards Uwe/dj8wx/jo43sv
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-01/msg00126.html (9,279 bytes)

13. Re: LF: WSPR (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 21:54:36 +0100
Hi Ko, thanks. did you receive the signs without any QRN/QRM? 73 Uwe/dj8wx Hi all, dj8wx is xmitting at 135,975kHz in WSPR mode, pwr abt 50mWERP. RX dial 134,475kHz (USB). regards Uwe/dj8wx/jo43sv Hi
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-01/msg00171.html (10,997 bytes)

14. Re: LF: wspr (score: 1)
Author: Wolfgang Büscher <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 18:46:27 +0100
Thanks Victor, The signal on your screenshot with the strange "hook" at the beginning is DF0WD (operated by DL4YHF). Markus DF6NM noticed me in a PM about the effect. I don't know what causes it yet,
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-01/msg00180.html (10,352 bytes)

15. Re: LF: WSPR (score: 1)
Author: Ko Versteeg <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2009 21:24:06 +0100
Hi all, dj8wx is xmitting at 135,975kHz in WSPR mode, pwr abt 50mWERP. RX dial 134,475kHz (USB). regards Uwe/dj8wx/jo43sv Hi Uwe 2004 -23 0.4 0.135975 0 73 DE DJ8WX JO43 2008 -23 0.6 0.135975 0 73 DE
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-01/msg00268.html (10,406 bytes)

16. Re: LF: WSPR (score: 1)
Author: "James Moritz" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2009 00:50:55 +0100
Shouldn't they be marked as such by the program ? I have seen in the past some rows received by WSPR with the tag (bad msg)... but maybe it catches only some of the errors... Dear Alberto, LF Group,
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-01/msg00313.html (11,574 bytes)

17. Re: LF: WSPR (score: 1)
Author: "dave.riley3" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2009 12:32:12 -0500
TNX G, guess it was a bogus sig that shows up here often... Also TU fer grabber url Looks possibly good for tonight T/A with particle density @ 8.3 right now?? http://dx.qsl.net/propagation/propagati
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-01/msg00425.html (13,062 bytes)

18. Re: LF: WSPR (score: 1)
Author: "Graham" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2009 02:53:24 +0100
I don't think there is any 500 activity to night ? This grabber is a good indication ! http://www.wireless.org.uk/grab/ http://groups.google.com/group/uk500khz/web/500-khz-grabbers G .. -- From: "dav
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-01/msg00469.html (12,443 bytes)

19. Re: LF: WSPR (score: 1)
Author: Alberto di Bene <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2009 00:32:08 +0100
Hello Alberto, maybe a bad message. *F4DTL Nicolas* Shouldn't they be marked as such by the program ? I have seen in the past some rows received by WSPR with the tag (bad msg)... but maybe it catche
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-01/msg00497.html (10,267 bytes)

20. LF: WSPR (score: 1)
Author: "mal hamilton" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 17:59:34 +0100
Hi all I am getting strong traces of the wspr signals on 500 khz but only some decode, obviously the system is working otherwise I would get no decoded material at all. There also seems to be delays.
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-01/msg00576.html (9,546 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu