Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+visual\-CW\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+visual\-CW\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. LF: visual-CW (score: 1): Author: "Rik Strobbe" <[email protected]>; Date: Fri, 12 Nov 1999 17:15:39; Visual-CW (or slow-CW or QRSS) has become a rather popular mode on LF. It has 2 very important advantages : 1. signal far beyond the audible 'triggerlevel' are detectable, allwing QSO's that would ha; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/1999-11/msg00047.html (11,115 bytes)
2. Re: LF: visual-CW (score: 1): Author: "Nick" <[email protected]>; Date: Fri, 12 Nov 1999 22:35:51 +0000; Since visual-CW is derived from 'normal' CW we use the same morse code that was optimized for reception by ear. Nice concepts on the FSK. An interesting historical note is that Morse code was origin; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/1999-11/msg00050.html (8,553 bytes)
3. Re: LF: visual-CW (score: 1): Author: "Mike Dennison" <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 15 Nov 1999 11:51:00 +0100; I dont find QSOs that last 30minutes a problem. In any case I have listened to 'fast' rubber stamp QSOs that last that long!. The relaxed atmosphere of waiting for the reply to emerge on slow CW is t; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/1999-11/msg00089.html (9,080 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]