John W Gould wrote: To me the important point that I tried to make in my posting, which has drawn no comment, is the one I made about getting people to write up their experimental work for publicatio
mal hamilton wrote: Since there is no LF/MF news or acty I would like to know if anyone knows how the satellite scene is getting on. I have not seen any mention of satellite acty in Radcom for a long
Indeed. Another casualty this week is the recently relaunched Television magazine. An excellent example of a mag which at one time was profitable with a large market but with the decline in the telev
To me the important point that I tried to make in my posting, which has drawn no comment, is the one I made about getting people to write up their experimental work for publication, and specifically
In a message dated 16/07/2008 22:13:58 GMT Daylight Time, [email protected] writes: Radcom is not the only "Journal" to suffer the attack of the "designers" Electronics World has had the same
Dear all, I don't know about RSGB and RadCom but I am closely involved in UBA and it's magazine (CQ-QSO). There are probably as many opinions about the contents of a magazine as there are readers. So
Radio-REF has about 4 pages on satellites every issue. John F5VLF/G3PAI [ ... ] It is indeed strange that there is little coverage of amateur satellites in RadCom. I remember some years ago the socie
Apart from the scanty technical content and never any mention of amateur Satellites the presentation is poor. Get rid of the shiny glossy pages that reflect the light back into the eyes, also printin
Hi Nigel, whilst I agree with your sentiments it has to seen that those of us (you me and John at least :-)) ) who do know which end of a soldering iron gets hot are now in a minority amongst Radio A
Get Mal to write up some how to articles about 600 meters and submit those to Radcom. Might get things going again? Mike WE0H WD2XSH/16 on 600 meters Mal. Amsat is alive and well. - Not sure about th
I've not got an axe to grind re RadCom, but is the lack of major construction projects in RadCom more to do with there being less people doing the larger scale design/construction projects as well as
In a message dated 13/07/2008 22:10:42 GMT Standard Time, [email protected] writes: Mal, try http://www.amsat.org 73 Johan SM6LKM mal hamilton wrote: > I have not seen any mention of satellite acty
Thanks to Mal and Peter for their comments on the limitation of their own approach to construction related articles. I understand their viewpoint as it is similar to my own progress in getting on the
In a message dated 16/07/2008 21:07:05 GMT Daylight Time, [email protected] writes: I've not got an axe to grind re RadCom, but is the lack of major construction projects in RadCom more to do with ther
I suspect, Nigel, that "modern" RADCOM reflects "modern" amateur radio in many respects. Whilst acknowledging that the magazine/journal would probably not exist without its advertising, that very adv
Since there is no LF/MF news or acty I would like to know if anyone knows how the satellite scene is getting on. I have not seen any mention of satellite acty in Radcom for a long time, has this also
Hi John With only half a dozen operators active on 500 khz and then only at weekends, its unlikely to attract many authers. There is enough information already available for potential newcomers and v