Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+re\s+Vaino\'s\s+rx\s+findings\s+and\s+my\s+thoughts\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+re\s+Vaino\'s\s+rx\s+findings\s+and\s+my\s+thoughts\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. LF: re Vaino's rx findings and my thoughts (score: 1): Author: "Alan Melia" <[email protected]>; Date: Tue, 28 Sep 1999 21:55:13 +0100; Hi Vaino, I can confirm your findings on the AOR 7030+ . I have been using one since March and I have found it just as good as you do. I also have a HF150 and have tried a Palomar LF to 3.5MHz conver; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/1999-09/msg00117.html (13,841 bytes)
2. Re: LF: re Vaino's rx findings and my thoughts (score: 1): Author: Väinö Lehtoranta <[email protected]>; Date: Wed, 29 Sep 1999 12:10:29 +0300; Dear friends, Your comments, especially that of Alan, G3NYK, were much appreciated. Having been a professional monitor for last 40 years this AR-7030 Plus was my first investment for 'own' receiver.; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/1999-09/msg00119.html (10,061 bytes)
3. Re: LF: re Vaino's rx findings and my thoughts (score: 1): Author: "Toni Baertschi" <[email protected]>; Date: Wed, 29 Sep 1999 11:49:04 +0200; From HB9ASB, JN36pt I've also tried the AOR 7030 and it is - from the performance side - a very good receiver (I would never buy it because of the design and operation concept). But a 500Hz filter is; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/1999-09/msg00120.html (8,932 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]