Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+ebnaut\s+results\s+depend\s+on\s+sample\s+rate\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+ebnaut\s+results\s+depend\s+on\s+sample\s+rate\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. LF: ebnaut results depend on sample rate (score: 1): Author: Jacek Lipkowski <[email protected]>; Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2019 10:31:48 +0200 (CEST); For some reason the results i get from ebnaut are different depending on signal bandwidth. For Stefan's latest 2970.1Hz transmission it is better to use 10Hz sample rate than 240Hz: 10Hz: sq5bpf@jitt; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2019-04/msg00081.html (10,332 bytes)
2. Re: LF: ebnaut results depend on sample rate (score: 1): Author: Paul Nicholson <[email protected]>; Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2019 12:32:33 +0000; This is possible and quite common. For the carrier Eb/N0, the value of N0 is measured using the full bandwidth of the input signal. When the band is wider it may present a higher N0 because of things; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2019-04/msg00085.html (9,921 bytes)
3. Re: LF: ebnaut results depend on sample rate (score: 1): Author: Markus Vester <[email protected]>; Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2019 18:48:16 +0000 (UTC); /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2019-04/msg00088.html (11,604 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]