Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+activity\s+times\s+and\s+days\s+MF\s+\+\s+LF\s*$/: 5 ]

Total 5 documents matching your query.

1. LF: activity times and days MF + LF (score: 1)
Author: "Dr. Wolf Ostwald" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2016 07:15:18 +0100
good morning everyone :-) are there any ideas on installing say two or three activity days per week with given times for regular CW on 630 / 2200 ? it may enhance further activity . 73 de wolf df2py
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2016-02/msg00067.html (8,992 bytes)

2. Re: LF: activity times and days MF + LF (score: 1)
Author: DK7FC <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2016 14:19:54 +0100
Hi Wolf, I think you can forget about REGULAR CW activity on LF. For years i tried without success to rise that kind of activity. If at all, there will be "tests" and sporadic QRSS activity, which be
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2016-02/msg00077.html (10,905 bytes)

3. Re: LF: activity times and days MF + LF (score: 1)
Author: "Dr. Wolf Ostwald" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2016 21:06:21 +0100
Hi Stefan ! well, maybe it would be nice if You can coin an idea about a special activity hour on MF per week. It would be like in them ol` days when coastal radio stns checked into a circuit. Just f
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2016-02/msg00087.html (10,568 bytes)

4. Re: LF: activity times and days MF + LF (score: 1)
Author: DK7FC <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2016 21:40:06 +0100
Hi Wolf, No no, i don't want to be a master station. And others are no slaves at all. My signal may be one of the stronger ones :-) but this does not rise me in a higher position. Yes it would be int
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2016-02/msg00088.html (11,559 bytes)

5. Re: LF: activity times and days MF + LF (score: 1)
Author: "Dr. Wolf Ostwald" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2016 06:37:24 +0100
Hi Stefan ! no, i was just using the master/slave scheme from LORAN systems as an analogy. As everybody on this reflector is familiar with it ;-) I guess the "master station " should be selected from
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2016-02/msg00092.html (12,981 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu