Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Wimborne\s+talk\s+on\s+Wolf\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Wimborne\s+talk\s+on\s+Wolf\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Re: LF: Wimborne talk on Wolf (score: 1): Author: "James Moritz" <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 13:53:47 +0000; Dear Stewart, LF group, Nice to see everyone again at Wimbourne yesterday. Hope everyone had a good trip home. In response to Stewart's points, As far as I know, BPSK is good because you can use, ind; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-05/msg00125.html (10,727 bytes)
2. Re: LF: Wimborne talk on Wolf (score: 1): Author: "Stewart Bryant" <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 13:41:27 +0100; Thinking some more about this over lunch, I had clearly forgotten that in reducing the frequency by a factor of 10 you also reduce the phase shift by 10. You therefore have to multiply the phase shif; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-05/msg00126.html (11,163 bytes)
3. LF: Wimborne talk on Wolf (score: 1): Author: "Stewart Bryant" <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 12:32:44 +0100; I was thinking some more about Jame's talk on Wolf yesterday, and I have a few basic questions. Wolf consists of a data encoding system layered over an error recover system, layered over a bit synchr; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-05/msg00127.html (10,157 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]