Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Wideband\s+EbNaut\s+with\s+prefix\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Wideband\s+EbNaut\s+with\s+prefix\?\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. LF: Wideband EbNaut with prefix? (score: 1): Author: Paul Nicholson <[email protected]>; Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2017 23:17:39 +0000; A decode from a near field test at VLF: Rank 6938 Eb/N0 -0.4 dB 8K19A 60 chars The interesting thing is, the symbol period is 6.25 milliseconds (3152 symbols for 19.7 second total duration) and the m; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-01/msg00098.html (10,201 bytes)
2. Re: LF: Wideband EbNaut with prefix? (score: 1): Author: Roger Lapthorn <[email protected]>; Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2017 20:02:17 +0000; Hi Paul, My health is still far from good and I have never tried EbNaut, but I wonder if this would be good for earth-mode? With QRSS3 6km was my limit some years ago. I ran out of test sites but fee; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-01/msg00109.html (11,629 bytes)
3. Re: LF: Wideband EbNaut with prefix? (score: 1): Author: Paul Nicholson <[email protected]>; Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2017 19:27:03 +0000; Very impressive. I think that to substantially increase the range, ultra narrow band signals would be the way to go, just as with VLF radio. I haven't seen anyone try earth mode with very narrow band; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-01/msg00118.html (10,911 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]