Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+WSPR\s+window\s*$/: 13 ]

Total 13 documents matching your query.

1. LF: WSPR window (score: 1)
Author: <>
Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2010 18:30:19 -0400
This is nuts! We finally move the US WSPR stations out of the EU WSPR 502.4 window down to a new US WSPR 499.6 window so that those that want to monitor can have a clear shot at the EU stations. Then
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-11/msg00007.html (12,170 bytes)

2. Re: LF: WSPR window (score: 1)
Author: "Albert" <>
Date: Thu, 4 Nov 2010 10:21:12 +0100
Jay, LF, I'm not confused but astonished. Lets be glad there is some activity. I fully agree to the comments of John (GM4SLV) This is just what WSPR is designed for. Compared to the classic DX bands
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-11/msg00112.html (10,302 bytes)

3. Re: LF: WSPR window (score: 1)
Author: gm4slv <>
Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2010 22:20:05 +0000
Jay, LF, Fair enough. I still think we're all better transmitting and receiving on the same part of the spectrum - as this maximizes the number of sources and sinks all being available at the same ti
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-11/msg00126.html (9,840 bytes)

4. Re: LF: WSPR window (score: 1)
Author: John P-G <>
Date: Thu, 4 Nov 2010 07:58:07 +0000
Jay, LF Some interesting points to consider! I understand your basic thrust, and would, in general, agree that WSPR won't really work under the conditions you're describing, but I've put some thought
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-11/msg00140.html (13,739 bytes)

5. Re: LF: WSPR window (score: 1)
Author: <>
Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2010 20:25:38 -0400
John, Group Good discussion. While you might currently get some spots from the US stations in receive mode this number will go down as more US stations become active as the season progresses. More WS
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-11/msg00236.html (16,941 bytes)

6. Re: LF: WSPR window (score: 1)
Author: Paul-Henrik <>
Date: Thu, 04 Nov 2010 01:07:56 +0200
Hello Jay, LF As a receive-only participant in this field (I have no possibility to apply for a permit) I can only guess why some EU stations have chosen to move down along with the US stations: One
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-11/msg00260.html (14,338 bytes)

7. Re: LF: WSPR window (score: 1)
Author: <>
Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2010 16:42:12 -0400
John and group Your 'data mining' produced some misleading results and conclusions... There were no "super strong groundwave" reports from W stations - in fact nothing in +ve SNR figures at all. The
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-11/msg00281.html (12,297 bytes)

8. Re: LF: WSPR window (score: 1)
Author: John P-G <>
Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2010 23:18:46 +0000
Jay, LF, Now I'm confused! The bulk of the active USA WSPR stations are down at 499.6 "dial", with RF carriers just inside the UK allocation at 501.1 One or two US stations occasionally might choose
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-11/msg00306.html (16,008 bytes)

9. Re: LF: WSPR window (score: 1)
Author: Andy Talbot <>
Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2010 23:17:58 +0000
Most transceivers can be operated in split mode now, isn't this a workable solution ? And anyone with separate Tx / Rx setups has got split frequency operation by default   Andy www.g4jnt.com On 3 No
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-11/msg00406.html (12,064 bytes)

10. Re: LF: WSPR window (score: 1)
Author: Paul-Henrik <>
Date: Thu, 04 Nov 2010 01:42:24 +0200
Hello Andy! Yes, your suggested solution works fine with TWO different WSPR copies running and configured for different frequency windows. One WSPR session for TX and another for RX. It can also work
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-11/msg00440.html (11,697 bytes)

11. Re: LF: WSPR window (score: 1)
Author: John P-G <>
Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2010 23:28:46 +0000
Andy, LF, Yes, I can (and have done) operate in Split mode - as I have separate RX and TX - but my point is that we should all be in the same place - I believe the concerns over "strong locals will d
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-11/msg00513.html (10,599 bytes)

12. Re: LF: WSPR window (score: 1)
Author: gm4slv <>
Date: Thu, 4 Nov 2010 20:33:11 +0000
Albert, Jay, LF, Indeed it is! One last comment, looking at the figures...... In the last 7 days the best reports SNR of a W station on WSPR was : 2010-10-31 04:44 WD2XSH/12 0.501151 -1 0 DM79gx 2 KL
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-11/msg00637.html (10,961 bytes)

13. Re: LF: WSPR window (score: 1)
Author: John Bruce McCreath <>
Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2010 19:33:45 -0400
Hello Jay, LFers, I totally agree with your comments Jay....I posted something to this affect just last week on the LowFER reflector. Having a "window" for eastbound signals and a different "window"
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-11/msg00676.html (9,720 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu