30 April 2016 Why do I sometimes see massive LF activity around a callsign I am pretty sure is not even active on LF, on the WSPR map? M0HGU also shows in the database as well as on the map. Example
Hi Chris, Do you refer to entries like this one? 2016-04-30 07:56 F6PRA 0.001480 -7 0 JN25nj 5 M0HGU JO02op 855 342 Seems to me that the receiving end does report the audio frequ
Definitely the receiving station has not entered details correctly. I would hope this would be corrected promptly once the station operator has looked at the results (eventually). Hugh, M0DSZ Why do
Hello Hugh and all who replied, Saturday, April 30, 2016 Thanks for the replies, I too have sent him an e-mail at the address shown on QRZ, but no reply, but at least it didn't bounce. Maybe he's gon
All, I am, indeed, not (yet) active on LF. I have had a malfunction of the CAT interface between my radio and the WSPR program. It seems it has occasionally failed in the past but I've seen to tell-t
Hello Nick, Monday, May 2, 2016 No worries Nick, and thanks for your reply, these things happen, not life changing, nor has it cost me any £££'s :) Be good to see more folk on LF, I hope you will hav
Hello Nick. OK and fine at all to resolve that. But don't worry, now it is GOSLN who took back this habit : 2016-05-03 10:04 G6JVT 0.001455 -21 0 IO90st 0.2 G0SLN IO94hu 454 353 2016-05-03 10:04 PI9E
...maybe it is worth to suggest to the operators of the WSPR database to sort out decodes between 1.4...1.525 kHz instead of putting them into the LF section. Or has someone planned transmissions on
