Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+WSPR\s+TA\s+spots\s+on\s+630m\s*$/>

Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+WSPR\s+TA\s+spots\s+on\s+630m\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. LF: WSPR TA spots on 630m (score: 1): Author: "Clemens Paul" <[email protected]>; Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 14:18:16 +0100; Conditions seem to improve: 2016-02-15 19:04 VE7QZZ 0.475805 -32 1 QF89 0.002 DL4RAJ JN68kj 16396 314 2016-02-16 05:08 WG2XXM 0.475711 -25 0 EM15lj 5 DL4RAJ JN68kj 8406 40 2016-02-16 05:16 WG2XXM 0.4; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2016-02/msg00237.html (8,859 bytes)
2. LF: WSPR TA spots on 630m (score: 1): Author: "Clemens Paul" <[email protected]>; Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 14:21:58 +0100; Conditions seem to improve: 2016-02-15 19:04 VE7QZZ 0.475805 -32 1 QF89 0.002 DL4RAJ JN68kj 16396 314 2016-02-16 05:08 WG2XXM 0.475711 -25 0 EM15lj 5 DL4RAJ JN68kj 8406 40 2016-02-16 05:16 WG2XXM 0.4; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2016-02/msg00238.html (8,831 bytes)
3. Re: LF: WSPR TA spots on 630m (score: 1): Author: John Andrews <[email protected]>; Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 08:33:43 -0500; Paul, The VE7QZZ spot is probably not real, as it was not reported by anyone on this side of the pond. The WG2XXM spots are good, and congratulations are in order. John, W1TAG 2016-02-15 19:04 VE7QZZ; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2016-02/msg00240.html (9,383 bytes)
4. Re: LF: WSPR TA spots on 630m (score: 1): Author: John Langridge <[email protected]>; Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 07:34:49 -0600; I believe the VE7 is a band selection error by DL4RAJ. XXM is legit. 73! John KB5NJD / WG2XIQ On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 7:21 AM, Clemens Paul <[email protected]> wrote: Conditions seem to improve: 2016-02; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2016-02/msg00241.html (10,753 bytes)
5. RE: LF: WSPR TA spots on 630m (score: 1): Author: "Clemens Paul" <[email protected]>; Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 14:52:06 +0100; Hi John, our emails have crossed. False decode,yes. Operator error,no. VE7QZZ hasn't been TX'ing on any band in WSPR. It appears that WSPR creates sometimes wrong callsigns when decoding is critical.; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2016-02/msg00243.html (10,634 bytes)
6. Re: LF: WSPR TA spots on 630m (score: 1): Author: John Langridge <[email protected]>; Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 07:59:24 -0600; Yeah you are correct Clemens. My mistake. I had seen a similar callsign in the data set and realized it after sending. My apologies. Yep, appears just a phantom. I mention the band error because; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2016-02/msg00244.html (12,648 bytes)
7. RE: LF: WSPR TA spots on 630m (score: 1): Author: Rik Strobbe <[email protected]>; Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 14:03:14 +0000; certainly false, the given locator (QF89) is some 100 km off the east Australian coast (close to Lord Howe Island, VK9L) 73, Rik ON7YD - OR7T Van: [email protected] [owner-rsgb_lf_gr; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2016-02/msg00245.html (14,935 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]