Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+WSPR\s+MF\s+please\s*$/: 11 ]

Total 11 documents matching your query.

1. LF: WSPR MF please (score: 1)
Author: DK7FC <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2015 15:23:45 +0100
Hello MF, I will do another test in my garden now, testing my modified MF DC RX. It would be nice if there were some detectable WSPR signals for the test. So if you like, please be actice there :-) I
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2015-02/msg00075.html (11,144 bytes)

2. Re: LF: WSPR MF please (score: 1)
Author: "mal hamilton" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2015 17:11:30 +0100
Stefan try CW just worked DL6TY on 472.8 CW 569 each way but at noon 589 each way. Now LISTENING for any dx calls Any one else about on CW--PSE CALL de mal/g3kev Hello MF, I will do another test in m
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2015-02/msg00076.html (10,845 bytes)

3. Re: LF: WSPR MF please (score: 1)
Author: DK7FC <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2015 23:24:52 +0100
MF, Thanks to the stations who were on the air. I got some interesting decodes near the -30 dB. Maybe there is QSB between both locations in 2.4 km distance? Results in the attachment. It shows again
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2015-02/msg00080.html (12,105 bytes)

4. Re: LF: WSPR MF please (score: 1)
Author: edgar <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2015 09:39:55 +1100
Hi Stefan, Do both sites use the same type of receiver? And do they have the same receiving band width? Regards, Edgar Moonah, Tasmania.
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2015-02/msg00081.html (10,506 bytes)

5. Re: LF: WSPR MF please (score: 1)
Author: "Markus Vester" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2015 23:41:50 +0100
Stefan, so it looks like your two receivers provide some spatial diversity, simultaneously listening to both may be useful to overcome fading nulls during QSOs. On the other hand, the advantage of a
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2015-02/msg00082.html (11,916 bytes)

6. Re: LF: WSPR MF please (score: 1)
Author: DK7FC <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2015 00:13:23 +0100
Hi Edgar, Am 08.02.2015 23:39, schrieb edgar: Hi Stefan, Do both sites use the same type of receiver? Yes, nearly identical. There's just one thing: The T antenna in the garden is resonated and match
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2015-02/msg00083.html (12,079 bytes)

7. Re: LF: WSPR MF please (score: 1)
Author: DK7FC <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2015 00:21:20 +0100
Hi Markus, Am 08.02.2015 23:41, schrieb Markus Vester: Stefan,   so it looks like your two receivers provide some spatial diversity, simultaneously listening to both may be useful to overcome fading
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2015-02/msg00084.html (11,739 bytes)

8. Re: LF: WSPR MF please (score: 1)
Author: edgar <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2015 10:52:01 +1100
Hi Stefan, Thank you for your reply. Interesting experiment. Regards, Edgar Moonah Tasmania.
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2015-02/msg00085.html (10,576 bytes)

9. Re: LF: WSPR MF please (score: 1)
Author: Claudio Pozzi <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2015 20:58:34 +0100
You should say "20m short coax cable" ;-) = 0.032 wavelength! In my opinion if the cable is shorter than 0.1 wavelength and low loss VSWR doesn't matter. 73 de Claudio IK2PII -- Claudio Pozzi - risp
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2015-02/msg00092.html (14,603 bytes)

10. RE: LF: WSPR MF please (score: 1)
Author: "Clemens Paul" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2015 21:55:24 +0100
Hi Stefan, what is the impedance of your RX input? 73 Clemens DL4RAJ
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2015-02/msg00094.html (11,031 bytes)

11. RE: LF: WSPR MF please (score: 1)
Author: "Clemens Paul" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2015 19:53:17 +0100
No matter how your antenna behaves on any frequencies the SWR is always exclusively determined by your receiver's input impedance. 73 Clemens DL4RAJ
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2015-02/msg00100.html (10,752 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu