L.S. Very surprised to see Japan in my log, I hope its a real one and not a web radio listener. 73, Albert PA0A 2018-10-30 20:20 PA0A 0.475790 -27 0 JO33de 2 JA3TVF PM74pc 9134 41
Hello Albert, The last few weeks I have received decodes from NAVTEX Malaysia and Shanghai on 518 khz. Reception in Finland has been far better, though. As you live a few hundred kilometers north fro
its very real - we had great conditions pre dawn to JA and Northern LA - hope it opens up wspr/jt9 to more Southerly Eu soon laurence Kl7l wasilla AK On Oct 30, 2018, at 1:01 PM, Albert <westberg@xs4
Heres the JA spots and reports for 475kHz last night https://userimg.teacup.com/userimg/6212.teacup.com/472khz/img/bbs/0003932.png and the path opened to VK from LA too I think either last night or n
Indeed, the condx are excellent. Or is it just the grown number of active stations? Last night i've been copied by 15 stations in > 5000 km distance... 73, Stefan
I think with solar minimum conditions have improved. I am hearing stations at great distance who have been active all along, but only recently have I been hearing them. For example, VK4YB at 15819 km
Stefan, Conditions were good last night. 73, Wayde K3MF --Original Message-- From: DK7FC <[email protected]> To: rsgb_lf_group <[email protected]> Sent: Fri, Nov 2, 2018 5:14 am Subje
Mike, Don´t underestimate the power of propagation. NDB´s from Canada and also MW broadcast stations have been much stronger than I have seen for years. Also the number of decodes of Canadian DGPS st
I agree with Roelof, alle LF/MF signals are string these days. Maybe this is related to the fact that we are going into the solar minimum? I remember I got regular TA spots on 500kHz in 2009/2010, ru
Yes, I saw your spots in KQ40. Unfortunately most active EU's live 2500 km more south ;-( Your best chance might be LA2XPA in JP33. 73, Rik ON7YD - OR7T ________________________________________ Van:
Oops, the Dutch spellchecker was doing his job a bit to well ;-) ________________________________________ Van: [email protected] <[email protected]> namens Rik Strob
Hi Mike, Interesting point. Is there a significant performance improvement of version 2.0 relative to 1.9r ? Or, is it worth the effort to upgrade? 73, Stefan Am 03.11.2018 16:02, schrieb wa3tts@veri
I have insufficient personal experience with 475/137 kHz to know for sure... With a few solar cycles of experience at 1.8 MHz I can say for sure propagation is **MUCH** better at solar minimum, espec
QED: 2018-11-03 16:32 KL7L 0.475667 -28 0 BP51ip 5 LA2XPA JP33 5961 13 73, Rik ON7YD - OR7T Yes, I saw your spots in KQ40. Unfortunately most active EU's live 2500 km more south ;-( Your best chance
Stafan: I believe WSPR-X version 2.0r was worth the upgrade for me, having used version 1.9r for about a year. And the 1.9r version was a definite improvement from the prior version I was using, whic
Hi Roelof, I am not actively following day-by-day reports these days, but I do remember a condition in one of the last Solar minimum where after a long geomagnetically quiet period signals seemed to
Hi Alan, That is an interesting comment. In my years DXing on 1.8 MHz I notice something similar. Quite consistently when Kp is very low for several days, propagation becomes poor (with the possible
Likewise for me, Mike. I do know that in 1.9 the improvements were mainly at LF and MF, by taking advantage of the phase stability of signals at these frequencies. My tests showed more advantage at
