Hi LF Regarding this issue there is an answer from Joe, K1JT Original message follows 73 de Luis EA5DOM I have received similar requests from a few others. We should probably address this perceived n
We should ALL answer this, with copies to K1JT and K9AN and/or the wsjt-devel list!!! I personally don't like the averaging idea. I am not technically knowledgeable enough to comment on the last part
Am 22.11.2018 22:49, schrieb VIGILANT Luis Fernández: 1. Is it clear that in practice WSPR-15 provides LF/MF decodes at lower S/N than WSPR-2? If so, ho much lower? Certainly yes. Of course! I
Joe has raised those questions before, and I've assumed that he has not been happy with the responses, including mine. Maybe a greater number of opinions would be of help. Regarding #2, the averaging
Hi All I agree. Absolutely. A greater number of opinions will help In another comment from K1JT, he complains about the lack of feedback from the LF/MF users And seems that he is completely right. We
Yes ... until EbNaut came along, WOLF was the most impressive weak signal mode. WOLF vs WSPR-15 at: http://www.w1tag.com/WSPR15WOLF.htm . Jay W1VD -- Original Message -- From: John Andrews <w1tag@ch
