Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+WSJT\-X\s+v0\.5\s+r2786_JT9\-10\s*$/: 14 ]

Total 14 documents matching your query.

1. Re: LF: WSJT-X v0.5 r2786_JT9-10 (score: 1)
Author: "Markus Vester" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2012 16:42:28 +0100
Bingo! 1539 10 -18 0.4 1919.85 0 DK7FC JN49 1W Best 73, Markus (DF6NM) From: [email protected] Stefan Schäfer Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2012 3:34 PM To: rsgb_lf_group@blackshee
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-11/msg00097.html (13,494 bytes)

2. Re: LF: WSJT-X v0.5 r2786_JT9-10 (score: 1)
Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2012 15:34:52 +0100
Thanks Joe for the update! The higher immunity to certain time delays sounds promising. It is likely that this caused most of the problems. LF! I'm going to run a JT9-10 beacon in the afternoon, star
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-11/msg00117.html (11,806 bytes)

3. Re: LF: WSJT-X v0.5 r2786_JT9-10 (score: 1)
Author: "Markus Vester" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2012 23:59:47 +0100
Hi Graham, of course I would seriously compare modes, based on conveyed bits per transmitted energy, or available radiated power. Of course I'd NEVER EVER dare to compare anything against handmade CW
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-11/msg00124.html (17,208 bytes)

4. Re: LF: WSJT-X v0.5 r2786_JT9-10 (score: 1)
Author: Michel Brunel <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2012 17:47:59 +0100
1619 5 -31 -0.4 1499.92 1 DK7FC JN49 1W 1639 6 -29 -0.4 1500.00 1 DK7FC JN49 1W Excellent !! Michel - f5wk --
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-11/msg00136.html (10,477 bytes)

5. Re: LF: WSJT-X v0.5 r2786_JT9-10 (score: 1)
Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2012 18:15:06 +0100
Hi Markus and Michel, Thanks for the reports :-) Hm, what is the lowest possible SNR in JT9-10? Guess i'm still 6 dB above the limit for Michel. I'll continue at 1W TX pwr until 18 UTC, then QRO to g
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-11/msg00173.html (11,700 bytes)

6. Re: LF: WSJT-X v0.5 r2786_JT9-10 (score: 1)
Author: "Graham" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2012 20:49:04 +0100
Mk.. Are you seriously comparing a time locked narrow frequency tolerance MFSK system with one based on a free running Manchester coded OOK system , immune from Doppler spread and capable of simultan
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-11/msg00224.html (14,538 bytes)

7. Re: LF: WSJT-X v0.5 r2786_JT9-10 (score: 1)
Author: "Graham" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2012 02:06:17 +0100
carefully levelled steel track Its funny you mention that , as it occurred to me , using one tone as a frequency marker was a bit like a mono rail , but each to his own , as is demonstrated by JR , g
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-11/msg00420.html (19,708 bytes)

8. Re: LF: WSJT-X v0.5 r2786_JT9-10 (score: 1)
Author: "Markus Vester" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2012 19:00:19 +0100
Stefan, I haven't transmitted yet today, and due to the lousy wx the antenna has been retracted to a low position anyway. Well if you can get the rx side to work, I could probably try to connect the
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-11/msg00604.html (13,624 bytes)

9. Re: LF: WSJT-X v0.5 r2786_JT9-10 (score: 1)
Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2012 18:47:05 +0100
Hi Markus, Am 29.11.2012 18:24, schrieb Markus Vester: Each of your transmissions has been decoded here. Are you receiving JT9 as well? The program is running and i can see my signal in the waterfal
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-11/msg00824.html (11,803 bytes)

10. RE: LF: WSJT-X v0.5 r2786_JT9-10 (score: 1)
Author: Laurence KL1 X <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2012 13:38:37 -0900
Markus - slow improvement over the Pole so will look overnight if anyone is still running from Eu Laurence KL1 X Alaska From: [email protected] To: [email protected] Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-11/msg00825.html (14,486 bytes)

11. Re: LF: WSJT-X v0.5 r2786_JT9-10 (score: 1)
Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2012 19:15:25 +0100
Markus, What about your indoor LF transmit loop?!! :-) 73, Stefan PS: Thanks for the hint about the CW station. I am now listening on the QRG but nothing so far. I would be ready to go in CW on 137.0
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-11/msg00847.html (12,615 bytes)

12. Re: LF: WSJT-X v0.5 r2786_JT9-10 (score: 1)
Author: "Markus Vester" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2012 23:31:49 +0100
Now since 22:10 my antenna is up again, TX running JT9-10 on odd slots, 0.6 W ERP. Will settle on 137424 Hz for a while, ie. 4 Hz above DK7FC. Best 73, Markus (DF6NM) From: [email protected] Marku
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-11/msg00886.html (14,097 bytes)

13. Re: LF: WSJT-X v0.5 r2786_JT9-10 (score: 1)
Author: "Markus Vester" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2012 18:24:21 +0100
Stefan, yes, theoretically JT9-10 should work down to SNR -37 dB in 2.5 kHz (which would read -41 dB on the Opera scale ;-) Each of your transmissions has been decoded here. Are you receiving JT9 as
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-11/msg00914.html (13,543 bytes)

14. Re: LF: WSJT-X v0.5 r2786_JT9-10 (score: 1)
Author: g3zjo <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2012 14:00:53 +0000
On 30/11/2012 01:05, Graham wrote: Wobbly bob is a organic anti coherent compound that is only available in imperial measures and may be used to induce instability in carbon based analogue systems ,
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-11/msg00967.html (18,751 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu