Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+VLF\/ULF\s+activity\s+weekend\s+21th\/22th\s*$/: 26 ]

Total 26 documents matching your query.

1. LF: VLF/ULF activity weekend 21th/22th (score: 1)
Author: DK7FC <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2017 21:31:41 +0100
VLF, ULF, This weekend there will be some activity on VLF and ULF! I'm running my next experiment on 2.97 kHz, my goal is to reach a 140 km distant location in France, JN38OO. During that time (recor
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-01/msg00169.html (13,626 bytes)

2. Re: LF: VLF/ULF activity weekend 21th/22th (score: 1)
Author: Paul Nicholson <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2017 21:54:13 +0000
Looks good Stefan. I'll be looking for your signals. I assume the daily 100 character 5170 transmissions will be off until Monday. Currently I'm testing some changes to the sferic blanker. I can't re
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-01/msg00170.html (13,497 bytes)

3. Re: LF: VLF/ULF activity weekend 21th/22th (score: 1)
Author: Markus Vester <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2017 17:08:33 -0500
Uwe, sorry to hear that. Here "Egon" broke one of my nylon lines last week, which was fortunately easy to repair. I hope to send some hours of carrier (8270.0025 Hz) and EbNaut (8270.100 Hz) this wee
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-01/msg00172.html (15,221 bytes)

4. RE: LF: VLF/ULF activity weekend 21th/22th (score: 1)
Author: <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2017 18:18:08 -0500
Hello Paul, Does your sferic blanker fill the gap with zeros, or with interpolated values, or does it eliminate the gap? Or other? I have been planning to make a Matlab impulse post-processor that fi
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-01/msg00173.html (14,388 bytes)

5. Re: LF: VLF/ULF activity weekend 21th/22th (score: 1)
Author: DK7FC <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2017 00:48:43 +0100
Am 19.01.2017 22:54, schrieb Paul Nicholson: I assume the daily 100 character 5170 transmissions will be off until Monday. Yes, confirmed. A first test at 150 mA is running in the moment, since 23:15
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-01/msg00175.html (12,941 bytes)

6. Re: LF: VLF/ULF activity weekend 21th/22th (score: 1)
Author: DK7FC <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2017 14:53:45 +0100
Am 19.01.2017 22:54, schrieb Paul Nicholson: Looks good Stefan.  I'll be looking for your signals. Is there already a visible peak? The ERP is 2.8 uW. The carrier is now running since almost 6 hours.
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-01/msg00179.html (13,696 bytes)

7. Re: LF: VLF/ULF activity weekend 21th/22th (score: 1)
Author: DK7FC <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2017 16:17:31 +0100
...sorry i just see that my frequency is 2970.000 Hz, not 2970.005 Hz as announced... 73, Stefan Am 20.01.2017 14:53, schrieb DK7FC: Am 19.01.2017 22:54, schrieb Paul Nicholson: Looks good Stefan.  I
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-01/msg00181.html (13,981 bytes)

8. Re: LF: VLF/ULF activity weekend 21th/22th (score: 1)
Author: Vincent Stallbaum <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2017 16:38:46 +0100
Wow, what a broadcast schedule! Probably there is too much noise at my QTH for recieving you on 2970 Hz Stefan, but grabbers are running (https://qrz.com/db/DL6II). Maybe I can improve the RX a bit t
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-01/msg00183.html (14,967 bytes)

9. Re: LF: VLF/ULF activity weekend 21th/22th (score: 1)
Author: DK7FC <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2017 16:50:13 +0100
Paul, Can you combine two transmissions on different frequencies or will that cause trouble? I changed the frequency for the tomorrows carrier between 8...17 UTC to 2970.005 Hz now but i could turn i
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-01/msg00184.html (14,922 bytes)

10. Re: LF: VLF/ULF activity weekend 21th/22th (score: 1)
Author: Markus Vester <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2017 12:10:54 -0500
Hi Vinny, I'm about to change over the coil from LF to VLF, and if all goes well I'll attempt to send a 8270.0025 Hz carrier for a couple of hours already this evening. It would be great if you'd cat
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-01/msg00186.html (14,151 bytes)

11. Re: LF: VLF/ULF activity weekend 21th/22th (score: 1)
Author: Markus Vester <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2017 12:21:54 -0500
Hi Stefan, in principle, combining transmissions from different frequencies should be possible, as long as a predefined common reference time is used for the phase When using SpecLab's GPS-phaselock,
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-01/msg00187.html (13,944 bytes)

12. Re: LF: VLF/ULF activity weekend 21th/22th (score: 1)
Author: Paul Nicholson <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2017 20:28:21 +0000
I cannot see any trace of a signal at 2970 here, from yesterday's (20th) transmission. Not even the faintest hint, down to 0.03 fT. Now I will look for today's transmission... -- Paul Nicholson --
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-01/msg00196.html (11,721 bytes)

13. Re: LF: VLF/ULF activity weekend 21th/22th (score: 1)
Author: Paul Nicholson <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2017 22:21:07 +0000
Your signal on the 20th detectable at Bielefeld via the online receiver of Wolf Buescher DL4YHF, distance 303.75 km! Just about exactly three wavelengths! So, you are transmitting Stefan! S/N is abou
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-01/msg00198.html (12,063 bytes)

14. Re: LF: VLF/ULF activity weekend 21th/22th (score: 1)
Author: DK7FC <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2017 23:55:05 +0100
Hi Paul, see http://www.iup.uni-heidelberg.de/schaefer_vlf/DK7FC_VLF_Grabber2.html and http://www.iup.uni-heidelberg.de/schaefer_vlf/VLF/TX.png to follow the actual transmissions.. 73, Stefan Am 21.0
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-01/msg00199.html (12,137 bytes)

15. Re: LF: VLF/ULF activity weekend 21th/22th (score: 1)
Author: Markus Vester <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2017 18:08:03 -0500
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-01/msg00200.html (12,530 bytes)

16. RE: LF: VLF/ULF activity weekend 21th/22th (score: 1)
Author: <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2017 00:44:05 -0500
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-01/msg00201.html (14,935 bytes)

17. Re: LF: VLF/ULF activity weekend 21th/22th (score: 1)
Author: Wolfgang Büscher <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2017 08:51:40 +0100
Hello VLFers and all, That's indeed a nice surprise, considering the low bitrate of the Vorbis-compressed audio stream that 'transported' Stefan's signal from here (Spenge-Bardüttingdort, near Bielef
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-01/msg00202.html (14,333 bytes)

18. Re: LF: VLF/ULF activity weekend 21th/22th (score: 1)
Author: Markus Vester <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2017 10:39:03 -0500
Hi Stefan, it looks like the final EbNaut transmission lasted longer than expected, ending around 14:50 UT. One possible explanation could be that the 7 char message was inadvertently also encoded wi
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-01/msg00204.html (13,056 bytes)

19. Re: LF: VLF/ULF activity weekend 21th/22th (score: 1)
Author: Paul Nicholson <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2017 16:42:00 +0000
A six sigma detection of DK7FC at DL4YHF's VLF rx at Bielefeld. A record distance of 303.8 km. http://abelian.org/vlf/tmp/170121a.png S/N is 15.9 dB in the 9 hour integration. The signal has been thr
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-01/msg00205.html (11,862 bytes)

20. Re: LF: VLF/ULF activity weekend 21th/22th (score: 1)
Author: Markus Vester <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2017 13:30:42 -0500
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-01/msg00207.html (12,086 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu