Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Tree\s+Losses\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Tree\s+Losses\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. Re: LF: Tree Losses (score: 1): Author: "Rik Strobbe" <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2001 16:46:21; Hello Walter, As far as I understand trees (dry or wet) do not shield on LF but they absorb RF energy. So instead of comparing them with a metal plate (as on VHF and up) one can better compare them w; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-10/msg00205.html (9,765 bytes)
2. LF: Tree Losses (score: 1): Author: "Walter Blanchard" <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2001 14:15:38 +0100; At 73/136 khz how far away from a wet tree do you have to be not to see any RF loss? At one extreme if your ant runs through it you will lose a lot; at the other if it is several kms away you won't l; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-10/msg00209.html (8,107 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]