Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Transatlantic\s*$/: 31 ]

Total 31 documents matching your query.

1. LF: Transatlantic (score: 1)
Author: "g3kev" <>
Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2000 19:04:12 -0800
Hi all From statistics available the only amateur stations active on 137 khz in the UK capable of making a two way qso across the atlantic are MM0ALM/G3KEV/GI3KEV/GI3PDN. The statistics are based on
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-01/msg00151.html (10,141 bytes)

2. Re: LF: Transatlantic (score: 1)
Author: "Rik Strobbe" <>
Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2000 10:50:39
The best way to find out wether we can cross the pond on 136kHz is to try it. What I have in mind is a transatlantic test, similar to what we did last year in cooperation with N4ICK, but with a much
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-01/msg00158.html (10,869 bytes)

3. Re: LF: Transatlantic (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Dennison" <>
Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2000 11:47:47 +0100
ON7YD wrote: The best way to find out wether we can cross the pond on 136kHz is to try it. What I have in mind is a transatlantic test, similar to what we did last year in cooperation with N4ICK, but
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-01/msg00159.html (10,678 bytes)

4. Re: LF: Transatlantic (score: 1)
Author: "g3kev" <>
Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2000 19:01:00 -0800
The best way to find out wether we can cross the pond on 136kHz is to try it. What I have in mind is a transatlantic test, similar to what we did last year in cooperation with N4ICK, but with a much
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-01/msg00177.html (11,737 bytes)

5. Re: LF: Transatlantic (score: 1)
Author: "Dave Brown" <>
Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2000 12:17:23 +1300
While it is generally correct to assume that bigger LF antennas will give better results, there is an important limiting factor that means any amateur 'pond crossing' will not necessarily benefit fro
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-01/msg00181.html (10,796 bytes)

6. Re: LF: Transatlantic (score: 1)
Author:
Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2000 23:22:01 EST
Dave Brown writes: That said, the use of larger verticals will not necessarily give the best takeoff angle for the relatively poor skywave that they tend to produce. Bigger ain't necessarily better i
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-01/msg00183.html (11,688 bytes)

7. Re: LF: Transatlantic (score: 1)
Author: "Rik Strobbe" <>
Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2000 11:59:46
You're right, DCF39 should be heard at the American side. But, assuming that both DFC39 as CHF have an ERP in the range of 25kW, if we heard CHF so strong then it should be no problem for them hearin
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-01/msg00189.html (11,286 bytes)

8. Re: LF: Transatlantic (score: 1)
Author: "Klaus von der Heide" <>
Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2000 22:15:01 +0100
A Comment on Antennas for Transatlantic QSO == 2 kilometers is a good wavelength. Then you have the chance somewhere to find some Hams living about a quarter of the wavelength apart from each other.
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-01/msg00206.html (12,041 bytes)

9. Re: LF: Transatlantic (score: 1)
Author: "Andre' Kesteloot" <>
Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2000 18:59:58 -0500
Let me add the motto of William the Zwijger (the Taciturn), which was: "Il n'est pas necessaire d'esperer pour entreprendre, ni de reussir pour perseverer" which can be freely translated as: "It is n
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-01/msg00212.html (10,585 bytes)

10. Re: LF: Transatlantic (score: 1)
Author: "Dave Brown" <>
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2000 15:12:47 +1300
Tnx to John (KD4IDY) for the useful comment. My point was that given the normal constraints on an amateur antenna LF setup, bigger ain't necessarily better for verticals, when gunning for real DX (20
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-01/msg00214.html (13,591 bytes)

11. Re: LF: Transatlantic (score: 1)
Author:
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2000 01:51:22 EST
Thanks, Dave. I think we agree on all but a few points, which may have to do with perspective. After commenting on that, I have an announcement that may hearten those preparing to undertake this bold
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-01/msg00215.html (20,452 bytes)

12. Re: LF: Transatlantic (score: 1)
Author: "john sexton" <>
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2000 14:23:10 -0800 (PST)
Hey guys, Klaus von der Heide, DJ5HG, has come up with what sounds like a brilliant idea. Can we turn into practice? John, G4CNN _______________________________________________________ Get 100% FREE
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-01/msg00238.html (9,943 bytes)

13. LF: Transatlantic (score: 1)
Author: "Walter Blanchard" <>
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2000 14:34:35 +0000
Might I suggest that North American listeners would get a better indication of conditions if they would listen for the Datatrak transmitters on 133-134 kHz? They only radiate 10 watts from 100 ft ver
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-01/msg00298.html (10,011 bytes)

14. LF: transatlantic (score: 1)
Author: "g3kev" <>
Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2000 19:07:00 +0000
Until we get some of the big antenna 160 metres operators in the USA/CANADA and the UK plus the rest of EU interested in 136 khz the chances of a qso are NIL across the ocean. These operators have th
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-01/msg00314.html (9,363 bytes)

15. Re: LF: transatlantic (score: 1)
Author: "Andre' Kesteloot" <>
Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2000 15:49:22 -0500
Until we get some of the big antenna 160 metres operators in the USA/CANADA and the UK plus the rest of EU interested in 136 khz the chances of a qso are NIL across the ocean. These operators have t
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-01/msg00316.html (9,615 bytes)

16. Re: LF: transatlantic (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Boucher" <>
Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2000 09:17:39 +0000
Mal I suppose it stands to reason that to make a QSO needs someone at both ends. As Andre says, think POSITIVE. I also worked XZ0A last Sunday after one call, and that was using my long, low 136 KHz
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-01/msg00320.html (9,725 bytes)

17. LF: Transatlantic (score: 1)
Author: "Klaus von der Heide" <>
Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2000 11:28:11 +0100
Hello LF-Friends, the negative result of the recent transatlantic experiment only says that the usual ham methods for LF contacts are not adequate for a transatlantic distance. A weak signal never ex
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-01/msg00322.html (12,131 bytes)

18. Re: LF: transatlantic (score: 1)
Author: "g3kev" <>
Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2000 20:44:18 +0000
Dear G3KEV, Have you made a specialty of positive comments Sincerely Andre' N4ICK I try to be realistic. Most are struggling to work each other a few hundred miles around Europe on LF. I hear them e
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-01/msg00331.html (10,738 bytes)

19. Re: LF: Transatlantic (score: 1)
Author: "g3kev" <>
Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2000 19:26:20 +0000
Hello LF-Friends, the negative result of the recent transatlantic experiment only says that the usual ham methods for LF contacts are not adequate for a transatlantic distance. A weak signal never e
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-01/msg00335.html (11,991 bytes)

20. LF: Transatlantic (score: 1)
Author: "Klaus von der Heide" <>
Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2000 11:55:44 +0100
Hello dear LF Friends, thanks for the many and divergent replies to my post! My Mother celebrated her 90th this weekend, so I didn't have any time to give an answer immediately. Now, let me quickly t
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-02/msg00004.html (13,896 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu