Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Trans\s+Atlantic\s+2200m\s+on\s+JT\-9\?\s*$/: 13 ]

Total 13 documents matching your query.

1. LF: Trans Atlantic 2200m on JT-9? (score: 1)
Author: Chris Wilson <>
Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2017 14:29:13 +0000
17 November 2017 Has there been a previous trans Atlantic reception of a JT-9 signal from the UK? -- Best regards, Chris 2E0ILY mailto:l.com
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-11/msg00120.html (8,154 bytes)

2. Re: LF: Trans Atlantic 2200m on JT-9? (score: 1)
Author: DK7FC <>
Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2017 15:37:10 +0100
I think that W1VD has detected my signal some years ago. But that was not JT9-1. There have been older versions of JT9, allowing to use longer time periods, up to 30 minutes i think! That was better
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-11/msg00121.html (8,426 bytes)

3. Re: LF: Trans Atlantic 2200m on JT-9? (score: 1)
Author: Chris Wilson <>
Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2017 15:16:11 +0000
Hello Stefan, Thanks, I was detected last night twice I think by N1BUG and I was using JT-9 (one minute TX sequences). For whatever reason Paul did not get the spots showing on the PSKReporter site,
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-11/msg00122.html (10,718 bytes)

4. Re: LF: Trans Atlantic 2200m on JT-9? (score: 1)
Author: N1BUG <>
Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2017 10:48:36 -0500
I have no words to express how much fun I am having just listening on 2200m! This has really put the fun back into radio for me. It will be even more fun when I get the transmitting antenna and trans
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-11/msg00123.html (11,426 bytes)

5. Re: LF: Trans Atlantic 2200m on JT-9? (score: 1)
Author: DK7FC <>
Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2017 17:02:16 +0100
Hi Chris and Paul, Very well, that is a remarkable success over that path in JT9-1! When Paul will have his antenna ready, maybe you can have a two-way QSO :-) Paul, i still have some wire here that
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-11/msg00124.html (12,941 bytes)

6. Re: LF: Trans Atlantic 2200m on JT-9? (score: 1)
Author: Rik Strobbe <>
Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2017 16:21:22 +0000
A pitty that then 'slower' JT9 versions have been abandoned. I found in particular JT9-2 (2 minute sequences) very useful on 472 kHz. A QSO took about 10 minutes and these was a +/- 3dB advantage ove
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-11/msg00125.html (9,768 bytes)

7. Re: LF: Trans Atlantic 2200m on JT-9? (score: 1)
Author: N1BUG <>
Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2017 12:07:32 -0500
Hi Stefan, You are doing very interesting things on VLF! I don't understand most of it even after some time looking and reading the few relevant web pages I could find, but it is interesting to me an
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-11/msg00126.html (10,889 bytes)

8. Re: LF: Trans Atlantic 2200m on JT-9? (score: 1)
Author: Alex R7NT <>
Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2017 20:06:05 +0300
Stefan, 2012-11-29 W1VD rxed DK7FC in JT9-10 - best QRB=6105km in JT9 http://136.73.ru/h_qso/index.htm 73! Alex R7NT  136.73.ru 2017-11-17 19:21 GMT+03:00 Rik Strobbe <>: A pit
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-11/msg00127.html (12,363 bytes)

9. Re: LF: Trans Atlantic 2200m on JT-9? (score: 1)
Author: N1BUG <>
Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2017 12:15:03 -0500
Hi Rik, I agree, what a pity that the slower flavors of JT9 have been abandoned along with WSPR-15. I suppose we are too few in number to be important, and these modes are probably off little interes
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-11/msg00128.html (10,274 bytes)

10. Re: LF: Trans Atlantic 2200m on JT-9? (score: 1)
Author: Chris Wilson <>
Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2017 17:18:12 +0000
Hello Paul, I too look on in awe at the VLF stuff Stefan and Paul Nicholson and the gang get up to, and similarly whilst I do not fully understand Ebnaut it is nearly unbelievable what they achieve,
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-11/msg00129.html (11,900 bytes)

11. Re: LF: Trans Atlantic 2200m on JT-9? (score: 1)
Author: DK7FC <>
Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2017 18:20:55 +0100
Hello Alex, Oh you are very good informed. I'm getting old! But i knew there was something :-) Ok JT9-10 is 10 dB 'better', theoretically. I think it was one of the French stations who still has the
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-11/msg00130.html (12,733 bytes)

12. Re: LF: Trans Atlantic 2200m on JT-9? (score: 1)
Author: "" <>
Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2017 17:25:26 -0500
Alex I haven't looked at your 136 kHz list in a while ... it was quite a trip down 'memory lane'! Your work on the list is much appreciated. Jay W1VD WD2XNS WE2XGR/2 -- Original Message -- From: Alex
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-11/msg00131.html (13,900 bytes)

13. Re: LF: Trans Atlantic 2200m on JT-9? (score: 1)
Author: N1BUG <>
Date: Sat, 18 Nov 2017 05:32:43 -0500
I really appreciate your reports, seems you "da' man" for LF reception from EU at the moment, Stateside :) Perhaps, Chris, but you "da' man" for LF transmitting from EU to stateside. :) Congratulatio
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-11/msg00132.html (11,058 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu