Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Topband\s+\?\s*$/>

Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Topband\s+\?\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. Re: LF: Topband ? (score: 1): Author: Daniel Ankers <[email protected]>; Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2012 10:18:52 +0000; But Shirley it's not been Topband since 30th January 1998 when 136kHz became available? Dan MD1CLV; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-03/msg00071.html (9,414 bytes)
2. Re: LF: Topband ? (score: 1): Author: "Roelof Bakker" <[email protected]>; Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2012 11:54:25 +0100; Hello Andy, In my country around 1970 VHF/UHF enthusiasts used to call everything below 30 MHz the DC bands! Go figure! 73, Roelof, pa0rdt; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-03/msg00078.html (8,867 bytes)
3. LF: Topband ? (score: 1): Author: Andy Talbot <[email protected]>; Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2012 09:42:29 +0000; From 1 Jan 2013, won't Topband have to be renamed ? 1810 - 2000kHz, = "almost-but-not-quite-topband" Always thought is should have been called Bottom Band. The real "Topband" is 275GHz Andy www; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-03/msg00242.html (9,311 bytes)
4. Re: LF: Topband ? (score: 1): Author: Roger Lapthorn <[email protected]>; Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2012 10:26:32 +0000; But Shirley it's not been Topband since 30th January 1998 when 136kHz became available? Dan MD1CLV -- http://qss2.blogspot.com/ http://g3xbm-qrp.blogspot.com/ http://www.g3xbm.co.uk https://sites.go; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-03/msg00260.html (11,558 bytes)
5. Re: LF: Topband ? (score: 1): Author: John Rabson <[email protected]>; Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2012 11:35:33 +0100; Even earlier. Remember 73 kHz? The practice of referring to bands by wavelength goes back quite a long way. Does anyone remember Radio Luxembourg on 49 m broadcast giving its wavelength to 2 decimal; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-03/msg00538.html (9,189 bytes)
6. Re: LF: Topband ? (score: 1): Author: Daniel Ankers <[email protected]>; Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2012 10:32:15 +0000; I wasn't, but since G4JNT wasn't including the current NoVs for 500kHz I assumed that NoVs on 9kHz wouldn't count either. Otherwise 73kHz could also be included.; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-03/msg00584.html (9,641 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 6
Page: [1]