Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Tick\s+test\s*$/: 19 ]

Total 19 documents matching your query.

1. LF: tick test (score: 1)
Author: "mal hamilton" <>
Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 18:44:21 +0100
Reading all the latest postings, I am of the opinion that this procedure is not sound. Where does that leave those that qualified using the system? Would a re examination be feasable using a pen and
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2008-08/msg00012.html (8,886 bytes)

2. Re: LF: Tick test (score: 1)
Author: "mal hamilton" <>
Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 16:24:38 +0100
David. What year did the tick test start? Mal/G3KEV In a recent message, mal hamilton <> wrote ... inter alia One was expected to get at least 60% with 70 - 90% not unusual. I wo
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2008-08/msg00038.html (10,564 bytes)

3. Re: LF: Tick test (score: 1)
Author:
Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 05:27:44 EDT
In a message dated 06/08/2008 23:12:39 GMT Standard Time, writes: mal hamilton wrote: > I suppose the students cannot be blamed, since 1979 its their only > option, no alternativ
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2008-08/msg00044.html (10,397 bytes)

4. Re: LF: Tick test (score: 1)
Author: Ko Versteeg <>
Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2008 20:30:05 +0200
wrote: In a message dated 07/08/2008 10:31:28 GMT Standard Time, writes: ......... And, if you have an infinite numbers of monkeys with a pen and paper, one of the
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2008-08/msg00063.html (9,805 bytes)

5. Re: LF: Tick test (score: 1)
Author: Stewart Bryant <>
Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2008 13:44:56 +0100
David I always try to provide encouragement by saying " just by ticking a box you should have 25%. In the current marking scheme yes, you could actually have graded marks depending on how right/wrong
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2008-08/msg00082.html (10,294 bytes)

6. LF: Tick test (score: 1)
Author: "mal hamilton" <>
Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 10:27:37 +0100
Hello Chris/G4OKW You missed my point about tick tests. The tick test is like a lottery. Any person could have a stab at ticking the boxes and possibly pass the test, knowing nothing about the subjec
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2008-08/msg00090.html (9,904 bytes)

7. Re: LF: Tick test (score: 1)
Author: "mal hamilton" <>
Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 18:02:11 +0100
I suppose the students cannot be blamed, since 1979 its their only option, no alternative. The examination board and those that advised them are responsible. I have heard tales from those that passed
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2008-08/msg00110.html (10,888 bytes)

8. RE: LF: Tick test (score: 1)
Author: "Gary - G4WGT" <>
Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 15:38:12 +0100
David, LF, Thanks for the pointer to your web site, the content is interesting. I looked back at the early 60's when I took my RAE & thought, did I pass that. I hope you plan to develop the site furt
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2008-08/msg00114.html (10,809 bytes)

9. Re: LF: Tick test (score: 1)
Author:
Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 07:07:15 EDT
In a message dated 07/08/2008 10:31:28 GMT Standard Time, writes: David. It does not alter the facts as I specified before. A person with no knowledge about the subject could be
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2008-08/msg00115.html (10,546 bytes)

10. Re: LF: Tick test (score: 1)
Author: Rik Strobbe <>
Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2008 14:51:05 +0200
It is indeed like lottery for those with no knowledge. And in that case the chance of succeeding the test is about the same as the chance of winning the lottery. In a well designed MC test the chance
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2008-08/msg00131.html (10,916 bytes)

11. Re: LF: Tick test (score: 1)
Author: "mal hamilton" <>
Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 11:28:03 +0100
David. It does not alter the facts as I specified before. A person with no knowledge about the subject could be lucky and tick the right boxes. Like the lottery numbers selection, whereas a question
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2008-08/msg00144.html (12,701 bytes)

12. Re: LF: Tick test (score: 1)
Author: Peter Dodd <>
Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2008 00:15:50 +0100
mal hamilton wrote: I suppose the students cannot be blamed, since 1979 its their only option, no alternative. The RAF technical examining board used objective multiple choice question method in the
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2008-08/msg00202.html (11,548 bytes)

13. Re: LF: Tick test (score: 1)
Author: Alberto di Bene <>
Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2008 16:26:01 +0200
Unfortunately not in the British RAE. Stewart/G3YSX Oh, that is utterly wrong... if you don't penalize wrong answers, then you are really open to the possibility of persons passing the exam just by l
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2008-08/msg00205.html (10,606 bytes)

14. Re: LF: Tick test (score: 1)
Author: "mal hamilton" <>
Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 18:45:16 +0100
Probably TICK TEST Stewart Bryant wrote: Rik - there is a penalty for wrong answers Unfortunately not in the British RAE. Stewart/G3YSX Oh, that is utterly wrong... if you don't penalize wrong answer
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2008-08/msg00207.html (10,780 bytes)

15. Re: LF: Tick test (score: 1)
Author: David Pratt <>
Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 10:53:10 +0100
In a recent message, mal hamilton <> wrote ... inter alia One was expected to get at least 60% with 70 - 90% not unusual. I would say the standard has dropped dramatically over t
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2008-08/msg00234.html (10,174 bytes)

16. Re: LF: Tick test (score: 1)
Author: David Pratt <>
Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 17:06:50 +0100
May 1979 73 David -- +- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - + +- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - +
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2008-08/msg00236.html (9,997 bytes)

17. Re: LF: Tick test (score: 1)
Author: Stewart Bryant <>
Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2008 14:33:28 +0100
Rik - there is a penalty for wrong answers Unfortunately not in the British RAE. Stewart/G3YSX
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2008-08/msg00255.html (10,128 bytes)

18. Re: LF: Tick test (score: 1)
Author: "Graham" <>
Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 21:33:56 +0100
Since descending as one of 'Bevin's boy's' in 1946, The final closure's of the Yorkshire coal mines has brought a end to a life of splendid isolation. The final ascent has been a hard fort struggle w
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2008-08/msg00269.html (11,169 bytes)

19. Re: LF: Tick test (score: 1)
Author: Rik Strobbe <>
Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2008 22:01:14 +0200
Stewart, an alternative to penalty points for wrong answers is increasing the minimum score required to succeed. Maybe they do that ? If not (thus 50% = passed) it besomes indeed a gambling game. 73,
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2008-08/msg00287.html (10,480 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu