Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+The\s+CFA\s+Antenna\s+$again\.\.\.$\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+The\s+CFA\s+Antenna\s+$again\.\.\.$\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Re: LF: The CFA Antenna (again...) (score: 1): Author: [email protected]; Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2001 11:33:44 EDT; I might add, the W0KPH site shows what appear to be electrically short loaded vertical dipoles, which have nothing to do with the claimed principle of operation of the EH antenna, so far as I can see; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-08/msg00191.html (7,964 bytes)
2. Re: LF: The CFA Antenna (again...) (score: 1): Author: [email protected]; Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2001 11:24:15 EDT; << Hmmmmm - very interesting - I can't wait to see the legal battle over patent infringements! >> You mean, of course, in jurisdictions where neither device has to be demonstrated to actually work be; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-08/msg00192.html (10,280 bytes)
3. LF: The CFA Antenna (again...) (score: 1): Author: "James Moritz" <[email protected]>; Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2001 17:26:35 +0000; Dear LF Group, Alberto wrote: >It seems that the CFA Antenna now has a new incarnation, >under the name 'EH Antenna'. >Look here : <?color><?param0000,8000,0000>http://www.netc; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-08/msg00194.html (8,476 bytes)
4. LF: The CFA Antenna (again...) (score: 1): Author: "Alberto di Bene" <[email protected]>; Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2001 17:17:03 +0200; It seems that the CFA Antenna now has a new incarnation, under the name 'EH Antenna'. Look here : http://www.netcommander.com/home/w5qjr-/index.htm Or, for ham-related stuff, here : http://www.qsl.ne; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-08/msg00195.html (8,444 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]