Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+TS\-590S\s+and\s+WSJT\-X\s+TX\s+Delay\s+option\s+question\s+please\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+TS\-590S\s+and\s+WSJT\-X\s+TX\s+Delay\s+option\s+question\s+please\?\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. LF: TS-590S and WSJT-X TX Delay option question please? (score: 1): Author: Chris Wilson <[email protected]>; Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2018 13:17:37 +0000; Hello LF'ers. Hi, I run a fairly odd set up. TS-590 in split mode, TX'ing at 272 kHz from the DRIVE socket into a 1kW amp which by design halves the frequency. I use the X2 function in WSJT-X to give; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-11/msg00195.html (8,872 bytes)
2. Re: LF: TS-590S and WSJT-X TX Delay option question please? (score: 1): Author: Riccardo Zoli <[email protected]>; Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2018 17:41:42 +0100; Hi Chris, I think the safest switching method for your PA is to inhibit the driving circuitry in RX mode and introduce a "physical" delay, for example with a simple RC on the logic input of the same; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-11/msg00197.html (11,167 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]