Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Strange\s+signal\s+on\s+MW\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. LF: Strange signal on MW (score: 1)
Author: "Clemens Paul" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2017 21:37:07 +0100
Hello MWers! I see and hear a strange noisy broad signal sweeping between about 475,2 and 475.6kHz. On the waterfall it looks like a jamming signal from a SPSU. But I can see and hear it also on the
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-11/msg00190.html (10,550 bytes)

2. Re: LF: Strange signal on MW (score: 1)
Author: Markus Vester <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2017 15:47:02 -0500
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-11/msg00193.html (11,975 bytes)

3. Re: LF: Strange signal on MW (score: 1)
Author: DK7FC <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2017 22:08:02 +0100
Indeed! :-) But the chirpy signal between 474.2...474.6 is actually QRM. It is there since years and also visible on the DL3ZID grabber in noth DL, a few 100km distant. I like the signal from DL6TY :
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-11/msg00194.html (14,245 bytes)

4. RE: LF: Strange signal on MW (score: 1)
Author: "Clemens Paul" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2017 22:20:26 +0100
Hello Markus, bingo,thanks for the hint. Now I can read it on my persues,too,after having set the appropriate waterfall parameters, which is a bit tricky. Unfortunately the hell signal is in the wspr
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-11/msg00198.html (13,712 bytes)

5. Re: LF: Strange signal on MW (score: 1)
Author: DK7FC <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2017 22:35:24 +0100
...here it looks like the lowest frequency of his transmission is 476.2 kHz, just above the QRSS segment. So it should not affect the WSPR decoder performance, but maybe the SNR calculation since it
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-11/msg00199.html (15,590 bytes)

6. Re: LF: Strange signal on MW (score: 1)
Author: Markus Vester <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2017 16:37:42 -0500
Confusion... this band is apparently too wide for us ;-)) Clemens mentioned interference on 475.2 - 475.8 kHz. I pointed out the Hell signal which is really on 476.2 - 476.9 kHz. Stefan's reply refer
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-11/msg00200.html (12,968 bytes)

7. RE: LF: Strange signal on MW (score: 1)
Author: "Clemens Paul" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2017 16:19:38 +0100
Hi Markus, I agree.Probably it was just too late for me after a loong working day ... :-) 73 Clemens DL4RAJ Grabber.html =link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient> Virenfrei. =link&utm_cam
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-11/msg00218.html (13,580 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu