Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Special\s+Measurements\s+2\s+by\s+OH2LX\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Special\s+Measurements\s+2\s+by\s+OH2LX\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. LF: Special Measurements 2 by OH2LX (score: 1): Author: Väinö Lehtoranta <[email protected]>; Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2000 10:09:32 +0300; Special Report, G3WSC Puckeridge ¤ 15-16 April 2000 -- 16 April 2000 -- UTC-/Rx-dBmW/--Indicated Field strength dB(uV/m)--> --<-G3WSC bcn-->--128.2--128.9--135.8--138.8-- 0425 -128 -> +1 -4 +20 +3 +3; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-04/msg00210.html (10,076 bytes)
2. LF: Special Measurements 2 by OH2LX (score: 1): Author: Väinö Lehtoranta <[email protected]>; Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2000 11:23:49 +0300; Due to some editorial errors I'll resend this report as a corrected version. It was thought justified to include measured values also as best estimate for "Indicated Field strength". The use of recei; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-04/msg00212.html (11,054 bytes)
3. LF: Special Measurements 2 by OH2LX (score: 1): Author: "'Geri' Kinzel, DK8KW" <[email protected]>; Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2000 04:55:37 -0400; Hello Veino, 2. Due to ITU and EBU requirements we are engaged to use relative unit dB(mW), after some problems with our customers we have adopted "dBmW" instead of normal "dBm". In fact ITU regularl; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-04/msg00213.html (9,735 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]