No AC power at home, yet. My wife and I are essentially camping out, at home. We have plenty of firewood and a good fireplace, but we are bored. As you will have heard, we are among the lucky ones. I
Am 01.11.2012 17:07, schrieb g3zjo: Hi Joe / LF On my development system the same input level is required to make both WSPR and WSJT-X happy. Likewise on my shack computer. For example, see the scree
Well done the check, see the Screen shots 20 odd dB difference between WSPR2 and WSPR2 11 I take it WSPR3 is the same? If you can get the shots Tiny Pic runs on steam just lately. http://i48.tinypic.
Hi Joe / LF On my development system the same input level is required to make both WSPR and WSJT-X happy. Likewise on my shack computer. For example, see the screen shot posted at http://physics.prin
Joe, here the sound comes in definitely with 16 bits, and also the 16-bit wav files are at the right level. I was actually speculating that there might be a high/low byte (little vs big endian) issue
Joe, Am 01.11.2012 16:48, schrieb Joe Taylor: A few words for those reporting "too much audio" on input to WSJT-X. On my development system the same input level is required to make both WSPR and WSJT
Eddie, https://dl.dropbox.com/u/19882028/LF/serious.png 73, Stefan Am 01.11.2012 18:18, schrieb g3zjo: Well done the check, see the Screen shots 20 odd dB difference between WSPR2 and WSPR2 11 I take
Hi Stefan Of course it is difficult to get steady reading because of the pulsing the noise, but I think we get the idea WSPR2 11 sits at 0dB for the same audio level for WSJTX whilst WSPR2 shows -25d
