Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+SlowJT9\s+v0\.9\.02\s*$/: 13 ]

Total 13 documents matching your query.

1. LF: SlowJT9 v0.9.02 (score: 1)
Author: Rik Strobbe <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2018 15:59:50 +0000
I just uploaded a new beta version of SlowJT9: v0.9.02 [12 Nov 2018] Bug fixes: - Non fatal bug that that corrupted the cycle calculation fixed. Changes: - Calculation of the report (dB) corrected fo
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-11/msg00220.html (9,634 bytes)

2. Re: LF: SlowJT9 v0.9.02 (score: 1)
Author: ik1hgi Qrss Qrpp <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2018 17:42:44 +0100
I just uploaded a new beta version of SlowJT9: v0.9.02 [12 Nov 2018] Bug fixes: - Non fatal bug that that corrupted the cycle calculation fixed. Changes: - Calculation of the report (dB) corrected f
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-11/msg00221.html (12,433 bytes)

3. Re: LF: SlowJT9 v0.9.02 (score: 1)
Author: Eric NO3M <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2018 13:03:24 -0500
Rik SlowJT9 won't run in Wine in Linux, nothing particularly useful was output on the command-line.  I tried using an old version of WSJTX (0.95 r 3278) but seems there is some protocol incompatibili
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-11/msg00223.html (10,306 bytes)

4. Re: LF: SlowJT9 v0.9.02 (score: 1)
Author: Rik Strobbe <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2018 19:47:54 +0000
Hello Eric, yes, a scale factor of 2 and 5 is used. I hadn't any information about the old JT9-2 and JT9-5 modes and those scale factors seemed the most straightforward to me and make the conversion
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-11/msg00227.html (11,559 bytes)

5. Re: LF: SlowJT9 v0.9.02 (score: 1)
Author: N1BUG <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2018 15:12:48 -0500
Eric brings up a good point. Forget what I said the other day about beaconing with a U3S to be received by SlowJT9. I believe that won't work because the U3S uses the original JT9-2, -5, -10, -30 sym
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-11/msg00229.html (15,694 bytes)

6. Re: LF: SlowJT9 v0.9.02 (score: 1)
Author: Eric NO3M <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2018 15:42:05 -0500
Paul, et.al. Correct, the original timings were fit into a "window" vs. simple scaling.  Since the slowJT exe wouldn't run in WINE, I just ran a few commands to decode K5DNL: arecord -c 1 -r 12000 -f
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-11/msg00233.html (11,374 bytes)

7. Re: LF: SlowJT9 v0.9.02 (score: 1)
Author: Rik Strobbe <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2018 20:55:55 +0000
Hello Eric, Paul, as Paul says the original JT9-2 and JT9-5 symbol lenghts are probably optimized for "good use" of the 2 minute and 5 minute cycle. JT9(-1) has a exact symbol length of 6912/12000 =
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-11/msg00234.html (15,020 bytes)

8. Re: LF: SlowJT9 v0.9.02 (score: 1)
Author: Rik Strobbe <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2018 21:00:59 +0000
&#8203; Hello Eric, all, arecord -c 1 -r 12000 -f S16_LE capture.wav sox capture.wav capture_tmp.wav speed 2.0 jt9 -9 -d 3 -S 300 capture_tmp.wav cat decoded.txt That is amost exactly what I am doing
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-11/msg00236.html (14,277 bytes)

9. Re: LF: SlowJT9 v0.9.02 (score: 1)
Author: Rik Strobbe <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2018 21:13:09 +0000
I just had a look at the CPU usage of my computer: it is wobbeling between 2% and 5% but peaks to 40% if the JT9 decoder is invoked. I am afraid that invoking 3 instances of the JT9 decoder at (almos
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-11/msg00238.html (15,625 bytes)

10. Re: LF: SlowJT9 v0.9.02 (score: 1)
Author: N1BUG <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2018 16:43:03 -0500
I can confirm something similar. My CPU is running around 30% (it's a VERY busy system with many apps running). When SlowJT9 invokes the decoder I see a short spike to 50%, sometimes as high as 55%.
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-11/msg00240.html (13,933 bytes)

11. Re: LF: SlowJT9 v0.9.02 (score: 1)
Author: Rik Strobbe <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2018 22:04:16 +0000
Hi Paul, it seems that we will have to make a choice: - either the old JT9-2 and JT9-5 standard and only decoding one mode at a time - or keeping the current JT9-2 and JT9-5 parameters and keep the o
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-11/msg00243.html (12,171 bytes)

12. Re: LF: SlowJT9 v0.9.02 (score: 1)
Author: Rik Strobbe <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2018 22:20:20 +0000
Hello Antonio, solid copy of your signal on JO20IX: 2216 -19 -0.9 1309 @ IK1HGI BCN JN &#8203; Try a QSO? 73, Rik ON7YD - OR7T Van: [email protected] <owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-11/msg00245.html (14,264 bytes)

13. Re: LF: SlowJT9 v0.9.02 (score: 1)
Author: ik1hgi Qrss Qrpp <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2018 07:55:36 +0100
Hello Antonio, solid copy of your signal on JO20IX: 2216 -19 -0.9 1309 @ IK1HGI BCN JN Try a QSO? 73, Rik  ON7YD - OR7T Van: [email protected] <[email protected]> n
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-11/msg00252.html (17,621 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu