For those interested: in order to get JT9-2, JT9-5 and JT9-10 signals decoded with a JT9 decoder (from the WSJT-X suite), the JT9-2, JT9-5, JT9-10 audio is "speeded up" to JT9-1. During the process t
For those interested: in order to get JT9-2, JT9-5 and JT9-10 signals decoded with a JT9 decoder (from the WSJT-X suite), the JT9-2, JT9-5, JT9-10 audio is "speeded up" to JT9-1. During the process
For those interested: in order to get JT9-2, JT9-5 and JT9-10 signals decoded with a JT9 decoder (from the WSJT-X suite), the JT9-2, JT9-5, JT9-10 audio is "speeded up" to JT9-1. During the process
​Hello Andy, no I am not sure it is THE best way, it is just MY best way. Adapting the WSJT-X JT9 decoder might be a better option. Creating a nice interface is within my range but I am not sur
Hello Rik, all, It's the same for me. I know 2200m is mostly a engineers and experimenters band, but I came as a ham radio operator looking for challenging DX QSOs. Maybe I don't quite belong there,
Hi Rik, the way I would go about it is using windowed sinc interpolation. For the 9 / 20 decimation ratio for JT9-2, you would upsample by a factor of 9, but only one in 20 output samples needs to be