Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Signal\s+bandwidth\s+in\s+Op32\s+LF\s*$/>

Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Signal\s+bandwidth\s+in\s+Op32\s+LF\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. LF: Signal bandwidth in Op32 LF (score: 1): Author: VIGILANT Luis Fernández <[email protected]>; Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2018 08:06:05 +0000; Hi LF I'm puzzled with the readings of bandwidth at the Op32 correlation detection grabbers As source I'm using a GPS generated signal, which is coherent in phase and works for EbNaut So I tested thi; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-09/msg00277.html (11,518 bytes)
2. Re: LF: Signal bandwidth in Op32 LF (score: 1): Author: Andy Talbot <[email protected]>; Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2018 09:42:10 +0100; Hi LF I'm puzzled with the readings of bandwidth at the Op32 correlation detection grabbers As source I'm using a GPS generated signal, which is coherent in phase and works for EbNaut So I tested th; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-09/msg00278.html (12,932 bytes)
3. Re: LF: Signal bandwidth in Op32 LF (score: 1): Author: Markus Vester <[email protected]>; Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2018 05:25:41 -0400; Hi LF I'm puzzled with the readings of bandwidth at the Op32 correlation detection grabbers As source I'm using a GPS generated signal, which is coherent in phase and works for EbNaut So I tested th; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-09/msg00279.html (14,141 bytes)
4. Re: LF: Signal bandwidth in Op32 LF (score: 1): Author: Markus Vester <[email protected]>; Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2018 05:46:22 -0400; Hi LF I'm puzzled with the readings of bandwidth at the Op32 correlation detection grabbers As source I'm using a GPS generated signal, which is coherent in phase and works for EbNaut So I tested th; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-09/msg00280.html (15,451 bytes)
5. Re: LF: Signal bandwidth in Op32 LF (score: 1): Author: Chris Wilson <[email protected]>; Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2018 11:06:37 +0100; Hello Andy, Could this in any way supply a reason for me seeing the odd dead FET when running OPERA and never when running WSPR? I always had the feeling that the fact OPERA stops and starts so many; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-09/msg00281.html (11,366 bytes)
6. Re: LF: Signal bandwidth in Op32 LF (score: 1): Author: Andy Talbot <[email protected]>; Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2018 11:23:12 +0100; Partly, perhaps, but I suspect your dead FETs could be due to antenna reflections of wideband transients of a hard switched waveform. A sharp rise (or fall) time hitting a high Q antenna will cause; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-09/msg00283.html (13,704 bytes)
7. RE: LF: Signal bandwidth in Op32 LF (score: 1): Author: VIGILANT Luis Fernández <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2018 08:11:47 +0000; Hi Andy, Markus Thank you very much for the explanations on this issue I will modify the keying to avoid phase glitches and test again Have been running constant coherent carrier at 1W and could see; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-10/msg00006.html (21,442 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]