Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Sensing\s+loop\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Sensing\s+loop\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. LF: Sensing Loop (score: 1): Author: "James Moritz" <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 02:26:20 +0100; Dear John, LF Group, In principle, either method ought to work. To relate the current in the "sensing" loop to the induced EMF (and therefore the flux) in the main loop, you need to know the mutual i; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2008-08/msg00133.html (11,304 bytes)
2. LF: Sensing loop (score: 1): Author: "John RABSON" <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 17:15:03 +0200; I have a 2 metre square 8 turn loop which is series resonant on 138kHz. To calibrate this I am thinking of adding a single turn loop which can be fed with a known current and therefore produce a know; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2008-08/msg00142.html (7,929 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]