Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+SAQ\s+nil\s*$/>

Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+SAQ\s+nil\s*$/: 14 ]

Total 14 documents matching your query.

1. Re: LF: SAQ nil (score: 1): Author: "Alberto di Bene" <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2003 23:24:32 +0200; Geri and all, i also tried to listen to SAQ on Sunday morning around 8:30 UTC, but with my great surprise i heard a strong RTTY station at 17.2 kHz. I use a RACAL 1772 receiver with the long antenna; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2003-06/msg00000.html (10,397 bytes)
2. Re: LF: SAQ nil (score: 1): Author: "valerio gabbani" <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2003 20:08:50 +0200; did anyone of you copy SAQ on 17.2 kHz this morning? I couldn't hear anything, prossibly because one of those PSU's in the neighborhood making a terrible noise at around 18 kHz. 73 Geri, DK8KW (W1KW); /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2003-06/msg00003.html (10,606 bytes)
3. LF: SAQ nil (score: 1): Author: "Holger 'Geri', DK8KW" <[email protected]>; Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2003 10:46:26 +0200; Hi folks, did anyone of you copy SAQ on 17.2 kHz this morning? I couldn't hear anything, prossibly because one of those PSU's in the neighborhood making a terrible noise at around 18 kHz. 73 Geri, DK; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2003-06/msg00041.html (9,747 bytes)
4. Re: LF: SAQ nil (score: 1): Author: "Dick Rollema" <[email protected]>; Date: Sun, 06 Jul 2003 22:52:24 +0200; To All from PA0SE Bryan, G3GVB wrote: So: is the system directional ? The gain I mentioned was in efficiency. But there may be some gain by directivity of the aerial system as well, but this is not c; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2003-07/msg00169.html (10,468 bytes)
5. Re: LF: SAQ nil (score: 1): Author: [email protected]; Date: Sun, 6 Jul 2003 13:25:31 EDT; So: is the system directional ? >> Not significantly. The whole array is less than a tenth of a wavelength long, so there is not enough phase delay to achieve much directionality. The design was mor; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2003-07/msg00174.html (8,893 bytes)
6. Re: LF: SAQ nil (score: 1): Author: "Alberto di Bene" <[email protected]>; Date: Sun, 06 Jul 2003 19:00:22 +0200; Dick Rollema wrote: To All from PA0SE valerio gabbani wrote: Alberto, Thanks for the info, did you know also the antenna system used ? '73, Valerio IK5ZPV You can find info (in Swedish) on the Grimet; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2003-07/msg00175.html (10,039 bytes)
7. Re: LF: SAQ nil (score: 1): Author: "captbrian" <[email protected]>; Date: Sun, 6 Jul 2003 16:27:52 +0100; So: is the system directional ? Bryan - G3GVB (Near Brighton ) To All from PA0SE Alberto, Thanks for the info, did you know also the antenna system used ? '73, Valerio IK5ZPV You can find info (in Sw; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2003-07/msg00176.html (9,955 bytes)
8. Re: LF: SAQ nil (score: 1): Author: "Dick Rollema" <[email protected]>; Date: Sun, 06 Jul 2003 14:15:08 +0200; To All from PA0SE valerio gabbani wrote: Alberto, Thanks for the info, did you know also the antenna system used ? '73, Valerio IK5ZPV You can find info (in Swedish) on the Grimeton station SAQ, incl; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2003-07/msg00178.html (10,341 bytes)
9. Re: LF: SAQ nil (score: 1): Author: "Alberto di Bene" <[email protected]>; Date: Sun, 06 Jul 2003 12:31:54 +0200; valerio gabbani wrote: Alberto, Thanks for the info, did you know also the antenna system used ? '73, Valerio IK5ZPV Valerio, sorry, don't know which type of antenna they use. I just have this pictur; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2003-07/msg00179.html (9,789 bytes)
10. Re: LF: SAQ nil (score: 1): Author: "valerio gabbani" <[email protected]>; Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2003 15:59:20 +0200; Perhaps a silly suggestion, but a mistake I have made more than once...:-) The RA1772 in CW mode displays a frequency 1kHz lower than the actual receive frequency - so to receive SAQ you have to tune; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2003-07/msg00194.html (10,201 bytes)
11. Re: LF: SAQ nil (score: 1): Author: "valerio gabbani" <[email protected]>; Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2003 15:53:14 +0200; Valerio, at about 18.3 kHz there is a military station located at the Tavolara island, near Sardinia. It sounds like RTTY, and here it is quite strong, I can receive it by just connecting an indoor s; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2003-07/msg00195.html (9,947 bytes)
12. RE: LF: SAQ nil (score: 1): Author: "James Moritz" <[email protected]>; Date: Tue, 01 Jul 2003 16:41:33 +0100; Dear Andy, LF group, The RA1792 (the following model from the 1772 perhaps) displays the actual frequency at the middle of the filter passband, then generates an audio Yes - well, it certainly is on; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2003-07/msg00204.html (10,208 bytes)
13. RE: LF: SAQ nil (score: 1): Author: "Andy talbot" <[email protected]>; Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2003 13:45:33 +0100; RU Sure ??? The RA1792 (the following model from the 1772 perhaps) displays the actual frequency at the middle of the filter passband, then generates an audio frequency output as defined by the BFO s; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2003-07/msg00206.html (9,902 bytes)
14. Re: LF: SAQ nil (score: 1): Author: "James Moritz" <[email protected]>; Date: Tue, 01 Jul 2003 12:22:43 +0100; Dear Valerio, LF Group, Perhaps a silly suggestion, but a mistake I have made more than once...:-) The RA1772 in CW mode displays a frequency 1kHz lower than the actual receive frequency - so to rece; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2003-07/msg00207.html (9,904 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 14
Page: [1]