Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+SAQ\s+\'extra\s+transmission\'\s+in\s+CT\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+SAQ\s+\'extra\s+transmission\'\s+in\s+CT\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Re: LF: SAQ 'extra transmission' in CT (score: 1): Author: Johan Bodin <[email protected]>; Date: Fri, 04 Jul 2014 20:09:59 +0200; ZCZC Brings back memories... I used one of those in the 70s to receive WX and news on HF and I had a few RTTY QSOs with it too... A ~30kg heavy metal mechanical UART designed in 1931! NNNN 73 Johan S; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2014-07/msg00006.html (10,218 bytes)
2. LF: SAQ 'extra transmission' in CT (score: 1): Author: <[email protected]>; Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2014 10:53:30 -0400; July 2, 2014 reception was slightly down from 'normal' and about on par with the Jun 29 2014 transmission last weekend. A short .mp3 of the tuneup session with the ID curiously sent as QAS! http://ww; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2014-07/msg00140.html (10,505 bytes)
3. Re: LF: SAQ 'extra transmission' in CT (score: 1): Author: <[email protected]>; Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2014 13:46:45 -0400; Laura Compared to transmissions in the past speed control is worse these days. Noticed that today and last weekend. I didn't make a close check of the frequency but they 'seemed' a bit high. During k; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2014-07/msg00156.html (12,100 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]