Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Receiver\s*$/: 14 ]

Total 14 documents matching your query.

1. LF: Receiver (score: 1)
Author: "Gus" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 19:42:15 +0200
Dear LF, My antenna is down for service, so i have only receiver mode for WSPR this night ;-( 73 de Gus SM6BHZ
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-09/msg00011.html (8,130 bytes)

2. Re: LF: Receiver (score: 1)
Author: "José de Sá" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2001 16:57:32 +0100
Hi Brian and all I used to have a TS-850 in the past but I have trade it for a TS870, now I almost forgot I have a TS-50, its the radio I usually use when I go to East-Timor and I always forget I got
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-08/msg00018.html (8,802 bytes)

3. Re: LF: Receiver (score: 1)
Author: "José de Sá" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2001 22:40:57 +0100
What about the TS-870 or the Icom IC-746 ? Jose CT1EEB choice. My question is if someone can say something about the TS-930S in this context. (I have to choose between those two) Ulrich, my personal
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-08/msg00026.html (9,109 bytes)

4. Re: LF: Receiver (score: 1)
Author: "Vernall" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2001 07:07:11 +1200
Tom G3OLB, Talking of TS-850s, does anyone know why my TS-850 changes gain at 500.000 KHz? Seems like an attenuator is switched in above 500 KHz. Is there a mod to defeat it? The TS-850 is manufactur
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-08/msg00027.html (9,408 bytes)

5. Re: LF: Receiver (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Boucher" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2001 16:58:04 +0100
Talking of TS-850s, does anyone know why my TS-850 changes gain at 500.000 KHz? Seems like an attenuator is switched in above 500 KHz. Is there a mod to defeat it? 73, Tom G3OLB In message <3B8CCCD4.
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-08/msg00028.html (9,428 bytes)

6. Re: LF: Receiver (score: 1)
Author: "Alberto di Bene" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2001 13:07:00 +0200
choice. My question is if someone can say something about the TS-930S in this context. (I have to choose between those two) Ulrich, my personal advice is to go for the TS-850. It has a very clean DD
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-08/msg00029.html (9,718 bytes)

7. LF: Receiver (score: 1)
Author: "Ulrich Idzes" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2001 09:48:44 +0200
Hello, I am in the process of choosing a suitable secondhand tranceiver for HF. Because of my interest in LF, I am looking for one with good sensitivity and selectivity on 137 KHz. From what I have s
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-08/msg00031.html (9,633 bytes)

8. Re: LF: Receiver (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Dove" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2001 12:43:50 -0400
Hi Ulrich, Concur Dave's advice on the Inrad filters. Their 125Hz @ 455kHz filter, although it might seem ridiculously narrow by 'normal' standards is perfect for LF use. In fact it's super for conve
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-09/msg00163.html (8,659 bytes)

9. Re: LF: Receiver (score: 1)
Author: "G3YXM" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2001 09:19:17 +0100
Ulrich I would recommend getting a good filter for the 455 IF, it really makes the receiver so much better. The skirt selectivity of the 8MHz filters is not as good as the 455 ones so you will notice
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-09/msg00165.html (9,570 bytes)

10. Re: LF: Receiver (score: 1)
Author: "Ulrich Idzes" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2001 08:29:20 +0200
L.S. Thank you all for your comments and advice. It made it much easier to make a decision. I got a TS-850SAT with 270Hz filter on the 8.33MHz if. So maybe I have to invest in a second filter for 455
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-09/msg00166.html (8,486 bytes)

11. Re: LF: Receiver (score: 1)
Author: "Alberto di Bene" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2003 00:12:58 +0100
I have similar good experience with the NRD-525. My only comment is that the display and microprocessor can generate some false signals which are down near the noise threshold aurally but can show up
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2003-03/msg00129.html (10,726 bytes)

12. Re: LF: Receiver (score: 1)
Author: Frank Gentges KŘBRA <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2003 17:54:58 -0500
Hi, I have similar good experience with the NRD-525. My only comment is that the display and microprocessor can generate some false signals which are down near the noise threshold aurally but can sho
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2003-03/msg00131.html (11,401 bytes)

13. Re: LF: Receiver (score: 1)
Author: "Alberto di Bene" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2003 23:39:59 +0100
Hi Alberto, The fuzziness that is my memory vaguely remembers you once saying that you were using a JRC receiver, which you really liked. Is this so, and which model? Hi Steve, it is the JRC NRD-525
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2003-03/msg00132.html (10,385 bytes)

14. LF: Receiver (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Dove" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2003 14:19:17 -0500
Hi Alberto, The fuzziness that is my memory vaguely remembers you once saying that you were using a JRC receiver, which you really liked. Is this so, and which model? All the best, Steve
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2003-03/msg00138.html (10,056 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu