Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+XES\s+Dual\s+WOLF\s+again\s+tonight\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. LF: Re: XES Dual WOLF again tonight (score: 1)
Author: "chastant" <>
Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2006 07:24:58 -0500
John I ran a simultanous capture this morning,so this may give some indication for a different period..and I agree signals are pretty strong at this distance..but take a look at this mornings data..
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2006-03/msg00103.html (11,795 bytes)

2. Re: LF: Re: XES Dual WOLF again tonight (score: 1)
Author: John Andrews <>
Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2006 02:10:24 +0000
J.B, Lloyd, Bill, Thanks for the reports. With the strong signals, it's a little tough to make conclusions, but... J.B. - The WOLF10 results look pretty normal, but the frequency is jumping around on
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2006-03/msg00104.html (10,082 bytes)

3. LF: Re: XES Dual WOLF again tonight (score: 1)
Author: "J. B. Weazle McCreath" <>
Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2006 01:21:56 +0100
Hi John, LFers, Sorry I can't do the simultaneous thing for you, but what I did manage was to do a fast QSY/Mode switch as soon as I had 2 valid lines of WOLF10, and as you can see, they both came in
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2006-03/msg00105.html (10,990 bytes)

4. LF: Re: XES Dual WOLF again tonight (score: 1)
Author: "chastant" <>
Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 20:15:58 -0500
John, I made 3 separate data collection of your simutanous Wolf with COOLEDIT and decoded them and labeled them as set1, set 2, set3.. Seems pretty clear from my end that Wolf 5 is the better but her
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2006-03/msg00106.html (16,002 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu