Hi Roman. My current TX produces 100 Watts, and the calculated efficiency of the antenna is abt 0.6%: 0.255 Ohm radiation resistance calculated with MMANA-GAL and a measured total antenna system impe
GE Minto! TKS! Who mny W? Whats an ant are you use? Roman RW3ADB. Thu Feb 07 2013 01:03:14 GMT+0400 (Local Standard Time) Minto Witteveen ([email protected]) I am currently TX-ing WSPR-15 @ 4
..and I just received a PM from Marco DD7P that he decodes my WSPR-15 just fine! So an FSK freq deviation of nearly 5% is handled just fine. Minto pa3bca -- Ceterum censeo Carthaginem delendam esse F
Hmm I just found an email (to this group) from Andy G4JNT, dated 17 jan 2013. w.r.t the AD9850 and WSPR-15 he writes the following: Incidently, the low cost AD9850 DDS modules with their 125MHz clock
That must be 475800 of course.. -- Ceterum censeo Carthaginem delendam esse --Original Message-- From: Minto Witteveen Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2013 21:58 To: [email protected] Subjec
TKS Minto! SWLing 136 khz today for a while. RA3TTS start Op32 at first today after QRT. I hope to see some activity on 472-479 in WSPR-15 and Op8 some later. Roman RW3ADB. Thu Feb 07 2013 01:54:08 G
I am currently TX-ing WSPR-15 @ 472800.. Just finished WSPR-15 programming in my PIC controlled AD9850 + 100W TX 'Normal' WSPR works fine (got lots of spots today) but with a tone separation of only
Hi Marcus, Thats good to hear. So it seems that WSPR is more forgiving than the documentation suggest and I expected (giving the tone separation with a 4 digit accuracy...) Regards, Minto pa3bca -- C
Hi Minto, I recently tried the same device for a local WSPR 15 test and had the same concern about DDS step size, but it decoded ok immediately. 73, Markus (DF6NM) From: [email protected] Min