Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+WSPR\s+MF\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. LF: Re: WSPR MF (score: 1)
Author: Minto Witteveen <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2013 22:51:14 +0100
Hi Roman. My current TX produces 100 Watts, and the calculated efficiency of the antenna is abt 0.6%: 0.255 Ohm radiation resistance calculated with MMANA-GAL and a measured total antenna system impe
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-02/msg00015.html (17,499 bytes)

2. RE: LF: Re: WSPR MF (score: 1)
Author: "Roman RW3ADB" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2013 01:37:11 +0400
GE Minto! TKS! Who mny W? Whats an ant are you use? Roman RW3ADB. Thu Feb 07 2013 01:03:14 GMT+0400 (Local Standard Time) Minto Witteveen ([email protected]) I am currently TX-ing WSPR-15 @ 4
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-02/msg00305.html (19,999 bytes)

3. LF: Re: WSPR MF (score: 1)
Author: Minto Witteveen <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2013 23:13:46 +0100
..and I just received a PM from Marco DD7P that he decodes my WSPR-15 just fine! So an FSK freq deviation of nearly 5% is handled just fine. Minto pa3bca -- Ceterum censeo Carthaginem delendam esse F
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-02/msg00306.html (22,322 bytes)

4. LF: Re: WSPR MF (score: 1)
Author: Minto Witteveen <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2013 23:09:01 +0100
Hmm I just found an email (to this group) from Andy G4JNT, dated 17 jan 2013. w.r.t the AD9850 and WSPR-15 he writes the following: Incidently, the low cost AD9850 DDS modules with their 125MHz clock
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-02/msg00341.html (20,879 bytes)

5. LF: Re: WSPR MF (score: 1)
Author: Minto Witteveen <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2013 22:02:45 +0100
That must be 475800 of course.. -- Ceterum censeo Carthaginem delendam esse --Original Message-- From: Minto Witteveen Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2013 21:58 To: [email protected] Subjec
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-02/msg00495.html (12,656 bytes)

6. RE: LF: Re: WSPR MF (score: 1)
Author: "Roman RW3ADB" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2013 02:22:06 +0400
TKS Minto! SWLing 136 khz today for a while. RA3TTS start Op32 at first today after QRT. I hope to see some activity on 472-479 in WSPR-15 and Op8 some later. Roman RW3ADB. Thu Feb 07 2013 01:54:08 G
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-02/msg00525.html (27,138 bytes)

7. LF: Re: WSPR MF (score: 1)
Author: Minto Witteveen <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2013 21:58:41 +0100
I am currently TX-ing WSPR-15 @ 472800.. Just finished WSPR-15 programming in my PIC controlled AD9850 + 100W TX 'Normal' WSPR works fine (got lots of spots today) but with a tone separation of only
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-02/msg00542.html (15,285 bytes)

8. LF: Re: WSPR MF (score: 1)
Author: Minto Witteveen <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2013 23:01:04 +0100
Hi Marcus, Thats good to hear. So it seems that WSPR is more forgiving than the documentation suggest and I expected (giving the tone separation with a 4 digit accuracy...) Regards, Minto pa3bca -- C
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-02/msg00580.html (21,613 bytes)

9. Re: LF: Re: WSPR MF (score: 1)
Author: "Markus Vester" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2013 22:51:55 +0100
Hi Minto, I recently tried the same device for a local WSPR 15 test and had the same concern about DDS step size, but it decoded ok immediately. 73, Markus (DF6NM) From: [email protected] Min
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-02/msg00731.html (19,529 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu