Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+WSPR\-15\s*$/: 47 ]

Total 47 documents matching your query.

1. LF: Re: WSPR-15 (score: 1)
Author: <>
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2018 16:09:39 -0500
Stefan Vague memories ... the tools, if they still exist, would be on an old computer that's not so easy to resurrect. Yes, it seems the current WSPR2 decoder is much improved. Think your time might
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-11/msg00293.html (13,274 bytes)

2. Re: LF: Re: WSPR-15 (score: 1)
Author: N1BUG <>
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2018 16:58:25 -0500
I am interested in this too, but if I recall there was a reason I didn't install those tools. I can't remember now... maybe they don't work on 64 bit machines? If that was it, I am out of luck. My WS
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-11/msg00294.html (17,296 bytes)

3. Re: LF: Re: WSPR-15 (score: 1)
Author: DK7FC <>
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2018 00:01:26 +0100
Jay, Paul, Am 14.11.2018 22:09, schrieb : Yes, it seems the current WSPR2 decoder is much improved. Think your time might be better spent on that mode since there are already man
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-11/msg00297.html (13,201 bytes)

4. Re: LF: Re: WSPR-15 (score: 1)
Author: Markus Vester <>
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2018 23:49:52 +0000 (UTC)
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-11/msg00299.html (12,983 bytes)

5. Re: LF: Re: WSPR-15 (score: 1)
Author: DK7FC <>
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2018 11:24:51 +0100
Hi Markus, Congrats to last nights successes! Well, since WSPR-15 is certainly the better mode for LF DX, and the WSPR team is not interested in LF, will you find the motivation to release an updated
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-11/msg00305.html (15,020 bytes)

6. Re: LF: Re: WSPR-15 (score: 1)
Author: N1BUG <>
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2018 05:46:17 -0500
Hi Markus, Stefan, LF It seems I remembered correctly even if I didn't know it. :) I am quite interested in WSPR-15 but I only have a 64 bit system available. I can transmit WSPR-15 using the U3S but
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-11/msg00306.html (13,178 bytes)

7. LF: Re: WSPR-15 (score: 1)
Author: Markus Vester <>
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2018 16:56:59 +0000 (UTC)
Hi Stefan, here is an attempt for a wspr-15 to wspr-2 receive converter which should also work under 64-bit Windows versions. Operation is similar to the old wspr-8 and -32 utilities http://df6nm.bpl
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-11/msg00317.html (17,868 bytes)

8. Re: LF: Re: WSPR-15 (score: 1)
Author: Markus Vester <>
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2018 17:02:53 +0000 (UTC)
First bug: Sndinput decimation factor needs to be 1024 not 512. 73, Markus --Ursprüngliche Mitteilung-- Von: Markus Vester <> An: rsgb_lf_group <> Vers
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-11/msg00318.html (18,503 bytes)

9. Re: LF: Re: WSPR-15 (score: 1)
Author: Riccardo Zoli <>
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2018 18:15:31 +0100
Hi LF, That's very good work, Markus! I'm trying on air WSPR-15 with an old WSPR-X v0.8 r3058 version. QRG: 137612 Hz Best 73 de Riccardo IW4DXW Il giorno Gio 15 Nov 2018, 18:00 Markus Vester <markus
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-11/msg00320.html (19,827 bytes)

10. Re: LF: Re: WSPR-15 (score: 1)
Author: Domenico IZ7SLZ <>
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2018 19:59:40 +0100
Hi LF, I want suggest a further way to try WSPR-15 with latest improvement of the WSJT-X vers. 2.0.0. WSJT-X uses the program wsprd.exe to decode wspr-2. This program has also wspr-15 capability. So
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-11/msg00324.html (20,419 bytes)

11. Re: LF: Re: WSPR-15 (score: 1)
Author: Markus Vester <>
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2018 23:55:03 +0000 (UTC)
The new script seems to do the job as it should. I'm currently running it to feed WSJT-X v2.0, side-by-side with old WSPR-X v0.8 r3058 set to -15. IW4DXW is decoding well on both screens (hence the d
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-11/msg00330.html (20,948 bytes)

12. Re: LF: Re: WSPR-15 (score: 1)
Author: Domenico IZ7SLZ <>
Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2018 12:14:28 +0100
Hi LF, i have tested this arrangement for two nights and the program WSPR-X seems stable and i have obtained many decodes. Thanks to all transmitting stations. By the way, seems that upload of spots
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-11/msg00360.html (23,519 bytes)

13. Re: LF: Re: WSPR-15 (score: 1)
Author: DK7FC <>
Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2018 12:14:59 +0100
There were a number of active WSPR-15 stations on LF last night and this morning, up to now, including N1BUG getting TA decodes. Well done. I see most stations are reporting with times stamps xx:15 a
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-11/msg00361.html (22,242 bytes)

14. Re: LF: Re: WSPR-15 (score: 1)
Author: N1BUG <>
Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2018 07:01:59 -0500
Not me. I was using the fully original WSPR-X along with the decoder which came with it. The old WSPR-X GUI is so unstable there seems no point in trying to upgrade its decoder. How many who run WSPR
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-11/msg00362.html (13,925 bytes)

15. Re: LF: Re: WSPR-15 (score: 1)
Author: "" <>
Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2018 07:25:13 -0500
WSPR-X V0.8 r3058 has always run fine here on several XP SP3 machines. Haven't tried it on Win7. No Win 10 machines here. I can supply the V0.8 r3058 version download to anyone that's interested ...
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-11/msg00363.html (12,159 bytes)

16. Re: LF: Re: WSPR-15 (score: 1)
Author: "" <>
Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2018 07:31:22 -0500
Domenico The WSPR-X upload problem can usually be fixed by clearing out the contents of ALL_WSPR.TXT file ... which grows quite large over time. Suppose one could automate that process with a batch f
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-11/msg00364.html (24,939 bytes)

17. Re: LF: Re: WSPR-15 (score: 1)
Author: Markus Vester <>
Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2018 12:51:47 +0000 (UTC)
Hi Domenico, all, thanks for this beautiful hack! It is working well also under 64-bit Win-10. To foist the new wsprd under WSPR-X, I had copied or replaced all "lib*.dll" files, some notes are here:
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-11/msg00366.html (28,868 bytes)

18. Re: LF: Re: WSPR-15 (score: 1)
Author: DK7FC <>
Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2018 13:58:47 +0100
Am 17.11.2018 13:01, schrieb N1BUG: How many who run WSPR-X successfully are on old versions of Windows which were around at the time this GUI was written and compiled? Is it always stable on old Win
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-11/msg00367.html (11,916 bytes)

19. Re: LF: Re: WSPR-15 (score: 1)
Author: Chris Wilson <>
Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2018 13:07:30 +0000
Hello N1BUG, BTW, here is the WSPR15 enabled version I am using in case anyone has trouble finding a copy these days: http://www.chriswilson.tv/WSPRX_08r3058.exe -- Best regards, Chris mailto:dead.fe
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-11/msg00368.html (12,166 bytes)

20. Re: LF: Re: WSPR-15 (score: 1)
Author: N1BUG <>
Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2018 08:29:36 -0500
Hi Markus, all, Win 10 64 bit here. In case maybe some of those DLLs are used for more than just decoding (?) I will do this here and see if WSPR-X becomes more stable! Did you take all those DLLs fr
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-11/msg00371.html (13,663 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu