Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+Trees\s+as\s+antenna\s+supports\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+Trees\s+as\s+antenna\s+supports\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Re: LF: Re: Trees as antenna supports (score: 1): Author: "Rik Strobbe" <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 17:19:28; Just a remark about slingshots / catapults : The larger models are considered as arms (at least here in Belgium, believe also in some US-states), so be carefull using these on public property ! 73, R; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-03/msg00204.html (8,171 bytes)
2. Re: LF: Re: Trees as antenna supports (score: 1): Author: "Steve Dove" <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 11:09:09 -0500; Hi all, Another proponent of the fishing-rod method. It does presuppose at least some wasted youth shivering on river-banks, or at least some patience as one learns how to cast. My favourite is a 7ft; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-03/msg00205.html (11,317 bytes)
3. LF: Re: Trees as antenna supports (score: 1): Author: "HighGain" <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 15:48:18 +0100; Here is a far better way to get high above 100 ft or more. I know from experience, I have several trees as supports. Use a small fishing rod, they are accurate. And you can get higher than 100 foot o; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-03/msg00207.html (9,725 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]