Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+TS\-950SDX\s+\:\s+good\s+for\s+LF\s+\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+TS\-950SDX\s+\:\s+good\s+for\s+LF\s+\?\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. LF: Re: TS-950SDX : good for LF ? (score: 1): Author: "Alberto di Bene" <[email protected]>; Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2001 11:09:18 +0200; Hi David / Alberto, I did use my TS950SD on 136 kHz, although I have pensioned it off at present with a move to the FT1000MP. Note that it is an SD and not the latter SDX model. I did not make any m; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-06/msg00263.html (9,353 bytes)
2. LF: Re: TS-950SDX : good for LF ? (score: 1): Author: "G3YXM" <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2001 12:19:43 +0100; Alberto. I think the front-ends of the two rigs are very similar. I know Graham G3XTZ used one with no problems. There is an attenuator on most Kenwoods which is switched in below 1.6MHz. Perhaps you; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-06/msg00280.html (9,354 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]