Hi John, yes well I always hope for a cry of "Rubbish!.... it's all like this" ! ....but it never seems to happen. I did get the original Dst idea in that way though my adviser was much more polite a
Alan, Hartmut's copy is along the same lines...weak copy of Jay early, and then very little after that. I note that there was an area of thunderstorm activity in the central Mediterranean area, but t
Hello Alan and all , Very beautiful explanation, thank you. If you look at the Capt_06 capture ( http://jpmere.online.fr/Temp/ ) one the increase of noise between 03:30 and 05:30 sees very well (the
Hi John I did have static type interference here much worse that earlier in the week. I have the characteristic vertical streaks.....the levels may have been more continuous with Jean-Pierre. Extra-t
Hi Laurence , Thank you for this interesting report, I acknowledge not to understand (but I am beginner in LF) but perhaps that with all the data we will be able to answer!!!! Best 73 Jean-Pierre f1a
Conditions started off very well here in Asia at duskyesterday , and I was hoping for great things - all the LW Bcst stations were way up - but as the night progressed all faded away - until pre dawn
Hi Jay , John , The noise iono/galactic was very high this night, not local noise, not of sférics! strange this propagation! I wait with impatient the report of Hartmut. Thanks for making walk your b
Jean-Pierre, Jay, XES did not go on the air until 0305 UTC last night. I am puzzled as to why conditions were so poor for both stations. It will be interesting to see Hartmut's report. John Andrews
Jean-Pierre XNS was on from 2300 - 0200 with no trace of a signal noted. What a difference a day makes! Propagation indicators looked good - was there a noise problem at you location? Thanks again fo