Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+T\/A\s+JAN\s+31\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+T\/A\s+JAN\s+31\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. LF: Re: T/A JAN 31 (score: 1): Author: "Alan Melia" <[email protected]>; Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 12:40:58 +0100; Hi Roelof, I dont think ARGO "needs" noise, I think it would be fairer to say that the noise should be used to set the "theashold levels". ARGO is very sensitive and it only requires an increase in s; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2006-01/msg00532.html (11,678 bytes)
2. LF: Re: T/A JAN 31 (score: 1): Author: "dj9dw" <[email protected]>; Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 15:26:38 +0100; Hi Roelof and group, in my location - JO40LE - close to Mainflingen -DCF - I had to increase BW for better rx-performence. The noise was caused by databursts from that nearby commercial LF-TX. Narrow; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2006-01/msg00534.html (10,935 bytes)
3. LF: Re: T/A JAN 31 (score: 1): Author: "Roelof Bakker" <[email protected]>; Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 19:44:27 +0100; Hello Alan, Alberto, Hartmut, Andy and Wolf, Thank you all. The picture is now perfectly clear, so to speak! I will stick to my 12 Hz bandwidth for the time being. Wolf, my receiver is a Wandel & Gol; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2006-01/msg00544.html (9,505 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]