Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+Slow\s+CW\s+Sensitivity\s+Measurments\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+Slow\s+CW\s+Sensitivity\s+Measurments\s*$/: 1 ]

Total 1 documents matching your query.

1. LF: Re: Slow CW Sensitivity Measurments (score: 1): Author: "Andy Talbot" <[email protected]>; Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2000 09:54:18 +0100; Which shows that the processing by eye is about as good as the processing by a good CW ear about 10dB S/N in their respective bandwidths. I think I would agree with the 30 Hz effective ear bandwidth; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-04/msg00194.html (11,207 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 1
Page: [1]