Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+Receivers\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. LF: Re: Receivers (score: 1)
Author: "Tony" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 3 Oct 1999 10:09:34 +0100
Dear all. There's been some discussion about filters etc recently which reminded me of a question I wanted to ask the group... What receivers/tranceivers work well on LF? and possibly.. What receive
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/1999-10/msg00011.html (10,350 bytes)

2. Re: LF: Re: Receivers (score: 1)
Author: "M. Bruno" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 03 Oct 1999 14:17:41 +0100
At 10.09 03/10/99 +0100, Tony G3ZRH wrote: However, although the Russian long range Alpha navigation transmitters around 11.9, 12.65, 14.1Khz continue to come through clearly using the Datong convert
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/1999-10/msg00013.html (9,811 bytes)

3. Re: LF: Re: Receivers (score: 1)
Author: "vernall" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 04 Oct 1999 09:45:37 +1300
Hi all, Thanks to contributors of comments on receiver performance at LF. Some more points tossed in to the melting pot ... The bandwidth and shape factor of a receiver IF filter is one of the "heart
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/1999-10/msg00020.html (13,275 bytes)

4. Re: LF: Re: Receivers (score: 1)
Author: "Dick Rollema" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 4 Oct 1999 14:17:26 +0200
To All from PA0SE I am not aware of a standard test method to produce measured results of how a receiver performs in noise to signal ratio situations (especially with impulse QRN on LF), but that par
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/1999-10/msg00030.html (9,084 bytes)

5. LF: Re: Receivers (score: 1)
Author: "James Moritz" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2004 22:45:41 +0100
Dear Mike, LF group I have an Icom IC718 transceiver - it tunes down to 30kHz, and has the typical 20dB loss of sensitivity at 136kHz compared to HF. I have the optional 250Hz filter, which is very g
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2004-07/msg00073.html (11,083 bytes)

6. LF: Re: Receivers (score: 1)
Author: "McAlevey" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2004 20:05:01 +1200
Mike I use an Icom IC-R75 with optional OCXO and 250Hz filter. Sensitivity is excellent. The only drawbacks I have noted are the AGC can't be turned off and there are a few strong birdies below 100 k
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2004-07/msg00080.html (9,735 bytes)

7. LF: Re: Receivers (score: 1)
Author: "F6CWN" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2004 02:07:20 +0100
I am compiling a list of receivers and transceivers suitable for 136kHz.... Your help would be appreciated. Thanks Mike, G3XDV == -- 13./07/2004 2335z Hello Mike and the list! Good initiative and ver
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2004-07/msg00093.html (10,638 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu