Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+Re\:RX\s+sensitivity\.\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+Re\:RX\s+sensitivity\.\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. Re: LF: Re: Re:RX sensitivity. (score: 1): Author: "Laurence J Howell" <[email protected]>; Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2003 21:50:16 -0900; Yep I get a few uV here too! I just copied Dave and Alans tests with CW min readable here in 150Hz, versus MDS (Min discernible perhaps this should be visible signal) using QRSS60 here using the WGPS; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2003-03/msg00100.html (8,303 bytes)
2. LF: Re: Re:RX sensitivity. (score: 1): Author: "Alan Melia" <[email protected]>; Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2003 02:06:45 +0100; Hi Ian that sounds adequate with any reasonable sized aerial you will probably get a few microvolts of noise from the aerial (I think I get abt 3uV in 300Hz) Cheers de Alan As it happens I checked ou; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2003-03/msg00102.html (9,815 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]