Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+Re\:\s+Wolf\s+Tests\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. LF: Re: Re: Wolf Tests (score: 1)
Author: "Larry Kayser" <>
Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2001 19:45:47 -0400
Mike: Tests: I have made recordings on the last two nights and can make WOLF lock onto something but little intelligence so far. Last night I used 11025Hz sampling which seems to make a bigger file b
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-04/msg00010.html (11,053 bytes)

2. Re: LF: Re: Re: Wolf Tests (score: 1)
Author: "Larry Kayser" <>
Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2001 19:33:10 -0400
Brian: I normally make a wide band spectrogram of the band and have automated it, thanks to Wolf DL4YHF, so that it is now running 24hrs. I am hoping to put the overnight picture on my web pages agai
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-04/msg00011.html (9,960 bytes)

3. Re: LF: Re: Re: Wolf Tests (score: 1)
Author: "john sexton" <>
Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2001 06:28:23 -0700 (PDT)
Hi Larry, Stick with 137.794. Although quite strong, the Luxembourg effect was no problem during the QRSS trials and unlikely to be a problem with Wolf IMHO. We are using such narrow bandwidths it re
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-04/msg00019.html (8,163 bytes)

4. Re: LF: Re: Re: Wolf Tests (score: 1)
Author: "Brian Rogerson" <>
Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2001 08:24:04 +0000
Hi Larry, If the WOLF transmissions are not going to be readable in Europe we have the option to change the time, or add another hour at a different time, or the digital session can be ended if it is
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-04/msg00020.html (10,246 bytes)

5. LF: Re: Re: Wolf Tests (score: 1)
Author: "Larry Kayser" <>
Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2001 16:23:06 -0400
Mike Dennison et all: every Does anyone know of a way to make a WAV file on a timer? I suspect by now this has been solved. Secondly - and this will cause some discussion (smoke!) I hope not, we dont
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-04/msg00026.html (13,416 bytes)

6. LF: Re: RE: Wolf Tests (score: 1)
Author: "Stewart Nelson" <>
Date: Tue, 1 May 2001 17:32:31 +0200
Hi Andy and all, A recent discussion with G3PLX made something click in my mind about the widespread adoption of Wolf for LF communications, and is it really the right way to go ? WOLF is far from an
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-05/msg00322.html (18,167 bytes)

7. LF: Re: Re: Wolf tests (score: 1)
Author: "John Andrews" <>
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2005 11:59:47 +0100
Should you have a hankering to try transmitting WOLF on a TA path I can keep an eye open on this side. And my shack needs to be cooled off, too, so I'd be happy to listen for any TA WOLF activity. Jo
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2005-04/msg00337.html (9,379 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu