Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+Re\:\s+US\s+500\-kHz\s+band\s+plan\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Re: LF: Re: Re: US 500-kHz band plan (score: 1)
Author: Warren Ziegler <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 14:42:12 -0400
Jim, Alan, Fritz does NOT represent all of the US 500kHz activity and his band plan is not being followed here by non-XSH stations so I would take all this with a large grain of salt. Keep in mind th
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-09/msg00142.html (17,675 bytes)

2. LF: Re: Re: US 500-kHz band plan (score: 1)
Author: "Alan Melia" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 14:40:29 +0100
Hi Jim. whist it involves a change in "usage" from our end it would not seem unreasonable to ensure that the US stations have a chance of hearing us without nearby swamping. I think this is an intere
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-09/msg00249.html (14,973 bytes)

3. Re: LF: Re: Re: US 500-kHz band plan (score: 1)
Author: "mal hamilton" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 08:47:42 +0100
The same applies here M0BMU does not represent LF/MF UK activity. It appears this was a false start and generated unnecessary debate. G3KEV Jim, Alan, Fritz does NOT represent all of the US 500kHz ac
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-09/msg00341.html (16,259 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu