Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+Re\:\s+Re\:\s+Best\s+tone\s+for\s+aural\s+copy\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+Re\:\s+Re\:\s+Best\s+tone\s+for\s+aural\s+copy\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. LF: Re: Re: Re: Best tone for aural copy (score: 1): Author: "Larry Kayser" <[email protected]>; Date: Sun, 21 May 2000 15:17:03 -0400; From Dave G3YMC 1. I have noticed that a weak station close or below noise is often much easier to copy if one walks away from the receiver. ..... I heard my first eme signal by putting my earphones; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-05/msg00316.html (10,189 bytes)
2. LF: Re: Re: Re: Best tone for aural copy (score: 1): Author: "Dick Rollema" <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 22 May 2000 14:52:44 +0200; To All from PA0SE 3. On the subject of receive notes. I also noted that Harry optimises his filter for 1kHz. Many operators including myself prefer a lower note, 600-800Hz or even lower. I suspect it; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-05/msg00332.html (11,838 bytes)
3. Re: LF: Re: Re: Re: Best tone for aural copy (score: 1): Author: "Rik Strobbe" <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 22 May 2000 15:53:42; The Swedish thesis shows that around 500Hz the ear/brain is at its best in copying wek signals in noise. 73, Dick, PA0SE For many years I was used to a 800Hz tone for CW (just happened to be the 'sid; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-05/msg00335.html (11,927 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]