Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+Re\:\s+Fast\s+CW\s+and\s+big\s+antennas\.\.\.\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. LF: Re: Re: Fast CW and big antennas... (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Olney" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2000 06:14:42 +1000
G'day All, Thanks to the many who replied directly to me re my comments. I am encouraged that there is a 'silent majority' out there who share the same sentiments. The wisest reply pointed out that a
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-03/msg00293.html (9,244 bytes)

2. LF: Re: Re: Fast CW and big antennas... (score: 1)
Author: "Dick Rollema" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2000 19:44:13 +0200
To All from PA0SE Older LF Receivers. While at Amberley museum, a few weeks ago, I came across a Marconi receiver, the CR200. It covers from about 15 to 500kHz in 4 bands so I asked if I could borrow
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-03/msg00304.html (11,638 bytes)

3. LF: Re: Re: Fast CW and big antennas... (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Olney" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2000 08:00:31 +1000
G'day All, Once again, thanks to all that have replied directly. I'm sorry but I can't reply to you all directly because of time restrictions. I must admit to be a little stirred up as it has become
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-04/msg00007.html (11,922 bytes)

4. Re: LF: Re: Re: Fast CW and big antennas... (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Sun, 2 Apr 2000 21:29:59 EDT
This is certainly a legitimate concern, but I wonder if the nature of the debate isn't being overstated. There may be a few folks who say it's all not worthwhile unless we can do it to commercial sta
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-04/msg00009.html (9,889 bytes)

5. Re: LF: Re: Re: Fast CW and big antennas... (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Olney" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2000 14:13:19 +1000
G'day John, I got a little excited and pressed the send button before I had added the following... The reference to "re-inventing the wheel" actually came from conversations with our regulatory autho
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-04/msg00010.html (10,297 bytes)

6. Re: LF: Re: Re: Fast CW and big antennas... (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2000 12:58:14 EDT
<< The reference to "re-inventing the wheel" actually came from conversations with our regulatory authorities when I was trying to convince them to grant me an experimental licence. <snip> He said th
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-04/msg00022.html (9,406 bytes)

7. Re: LF: Re: Re: Fast CW and big antennas... (score: 1)
Author: "g3kev" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 04 Apr 2000 08:56:54 +0000
G'day All, Regards Steve Olney VK2ZTO (P.S. I was going to add more letters here, eg., two Degrees Two degrees C or F ? and one Diploma, but I didn't want to appear to be a wanker, Is that a type of
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-04/msg00048.html (9,908 bytes)

8. Re: LF: Re: Re: Fast CW and big antennas... (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Olney" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2000 07:04:45 +1000
G'day Kev, Finally, you have proved the case for myself and the vast majority of reflector members. Now perhaps we can get back to the 'signals'. Over and out good buddy. Kindest and sympathetic rega
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-04/msg00052.html (10,013 bytes)

9. Re: LF: Re: Re: Fast CW and big antennas... (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Olney" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2000 00:40:03 +1000
G'day Kev, Appears I owe you an apology. I have checked with the Macquarie Dictionary Sales Department here and it seems the two page Aus edition you have is probably the special abridged export edit
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-04/msg00061.html (10,560 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu