Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+Re\:\s+FLASH\:\s+new\s+west\s+coast\s+signal\s+in\s+2200m\s+band\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+Re\:\s+FLASH\:\s+new\s+west\s+coast\s+signal\s+in\s+2200m\s+band\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. LF: Re: Re: FLASH: new west coast signal in 2200m band (score: 1): Author: "Scott Tilley" <[email protected]>; Date: Thu, 26 May 2005 23:41:27 -0700; John Can you take a bearing on what you hear? I don't believe it could be CFH with the strenght it has here... We never hear CFH with levels like this anytime. Regards, Scott Scott, 135.93/135.98KHz; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2005-05/msg00183.html (10,261 bytes)
2. LF: Re: Re: FLASH: new west coast signal in 2200m band (score: 1): Author: "John Andrews" <[email protected]>; Date: Fri, 27 May 2005 11:03:05 +0100; Scott, Alan, No sign of the signal in daylight this morning. I was just up answering nature's call when I saw the original message and checked the receiver. The signal was quite strong here, but not; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2005-05/msg00185.html (9,663 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]