Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+Re\.73KHz\s+beacon\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Re: LF: Re: Re.73KHz beacon (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Dove" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2001 11:26:07 -0400
Hi Laurie, Parked a rig on 71.9215 as well, using a loop that gets WWV on 60kHz very well. Nada, sorry. As John remarked, very noisy. So noisy in fact that except for a good lift at about 0500z even
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-09/msg00003.html (8,291 bytes)

2. LF: Re: Re.73KHz beacon (score: 1)
Author: "John Andrews" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2001 10:12:43 -0400
Laurie, et al: Negative copy on 71.9215 kHz Saturday night / Sunday morning. Very noisy here after sunset -- storms off the coast, I believe. The temp did get down to +4 overnight, so we're at least
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-09/msg00004.html (7,734 bytes)

3. Re: LF: Re: Re.73KHz beacon (score: 1)
Author: "Jonathan Jesse" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2001 22:09:17 -0400
No copy here as well. DCF77 on 77.5 had a nice signal as well as DCF39 on 138.83. The usual EU LW broadcasters were in there as well. As a matter of fact, 77 and 39 are looking good right now. Things
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-10/msg00353.html (8,288 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu