Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+RTTY\s+Protocol\s*$/: 11 ]

Total 11 documents matching your query.

1. Re: LF: Re: RTTY Protocol (score: 1)
Author: "Alan Melia" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 07 Mar 2013 01:30:40 +0100
Hi Eddie I did hear of the polarised solenoid losing their magnetism, but not in those circumstances, interesting! Did it recover or did it need repolarising or replacement? I had a couple of Mod 54
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-03/msg00005.html (23,202 bytes)

2. Re: LF: Re: RTTY Protocol (score: 1)
Author: "Alan Melia" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 06 Mar 2013 20:31:01 +0100
Hi Eddie, we were using line machines for a purpose other than that for which they were designed :-)) The way round this was to have some "special" operating methods which got lost when the ZX80 came
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-03/msg00036.html (20,631 bytes)

3. Re: LF: Re: RTTY Protocol (score: 1)
Author: g3zjo <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 06 Mar 2013 13:38:59 +0000
On 06/03/2013 13:14, Minto Witteveen wrote: That settles it. The info I got (from an untrusworthy source it seems) told me mark is 2125 and space is 2295. See my original message below. But it is the
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-03/msg00105.html (20,994 bytes)

4. Re: LF: Re: RTTY Protocol (score: 1)
Author: g3zjo <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 06 Mar 2013 13:29:29 +0000
Hi Minto I have just on comment below. On 06/03/2013 12:53, Minto Witteveen wrote: Hi Eddie,   Yes, after I sent the message I (re)checked and found that I switched mark and space frequencies (due to
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-03/msg00136.html (25,885 bytes)

5. LF: Re: RTTY Protocol (score: 1)
Author: Minto Witteveen <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2013 13:53:33 +0100
Hi Eddie, Yes, after I sent the message I (re)checked and found that I switched mark and space frequencies (due to some obscure reference I used. serves me well for not checking). So the consensus is
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-03/msg00183.html (20,617 bytes)

6. LF: Re: RTTY Protocol (score: 1)
Author: Minto Witteveen <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2013 14:14:46 +0100
That settles it. The info I got (from an untrusworthy source it seems) told me mark is 2125 and space is 2295. See my original message below. But it is the other way around. But it is only independen
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-03/msg00191.html (17,517 bytes)

7. Re: LF: Re: RTTY Protocol (score: 1)
Author: g3zjo <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 06 Mar 2013 19:52:33 +0000
Hi Alan Yes interesting. I had a Creed 7B? Rattler as well as my Z80 microprocessor set up, so I kept compatible with the mechanical methods. The Creed was in the garage and  I sent to it via co-ax f
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-03/msg00207.html (25,108 bytes)

8. Re: LF: Re: RTTY Protocol (score: 1)
Author: "Chris" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 06 Mar 2013 15:14:18 +0100
...and the message ended 'NNN', can't remember why. G4AYT. -- Original Message -- From: [email protected] g3zjo To: [email protected] [email protected] Sent: Wednesday, March
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-03/msg00274.html (19,637 bytes)

9. Re: LF: Re: RTTY Protocol (score: 1)
Author: g3zjo <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 07 Mar 2013 08:22:24 +0000
On 06/03/2013 22:59, Alan Melia wrote: Did it recover or did it need repolarising or replacement? Alan I can't remember the amount of confusion it caused, no doubt my opto couplers and silicon 30V sw
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-03/msg00413.html (10,583 bytes)

10. Re: LF: Re: RTTY Protocol (score: 1)
Author: "Chris" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 06 Mar 2013 15:24:57 +0100
Yes, CR, LF or two and some RYs. I remember that. Chris, G4AYT. -- Original Message -- From: [email protected] g3zjo To: [email protected] [email protected] Sent: Wednesday,
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-03/msg00414.html (19,378 bytes)

11. LF: Re: RTTY Protocol (score: 1)
Author: Minto Witteveen <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2013 14:57:05 +0100
My PIC software now does the following when starting a RTTY transmission: * Start the TX (mark) * wait 500 ms to wake up the receiver to the mark * send two NULL characters to get the receiver in syn
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-03/msg00510.html (20,827 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu